1.e4 b5!?

Sort:
adityasaxena4

after 41.Rxc4 in @Ben_Dubuque's diagram in post #20 there is 41.f3+ winning white's rook and the game!

aren_b22

Hello

darkunorthodox88
tygxc wrote:

#63
No that is not true. IM Basman did play 1...a6, 2...b5, 1...b5, 2...a6, 1...g5, 2...h6, 1...h6 2...g5, 1...a6 2...h6, but he never sacrificed the pawn. He played this even against grandmasters.
https://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1026325 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9dy8HIaC_Fw

there he is sacrificing the pawn on move 1. The opponent an expert chickened out but took it anyways a few moves later.

Donnsteinz
Ben_Dubuque wrote:

its not as bad as you would think, so far im undefeated in it and thats online as well as over the board

 

sent me a challenge if you feel like it's time to break your streak

JamesW0924

Are you sure this is not antichess

Cattycute



Yigor

Look also at my thread here: peshka

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/polish-gambit-interesting-sharp-line

dcyftukd

P03: Miller-Lamar Countergambit (Instead of taking with bishop, a4?! attempts to bring the rook out.

BOMBABOMBACLAT

bruh xd

BOMBABOMBACLAT

bombaclat

N0T-T0ASTY
did y’all know that e4 and then b5 doesn’t have a opening name