Raeyansh wrote:
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nxe5?!
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Nc3 Nf6 4. Nxe5??
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Nxe4!?
Sort:
I think people on this Thread have dismissed the move 7…Qf6 to Quickly.
I like it as a move!
Honestly, I am torn between 7…Qf6 and 7…Be6.
No one has mentioned 7…Be6 on this thread either for some change reason.
In the above position, White Light Square Bishop is completely and utterly annoying!
Every time I try to assemble a formation I like with the Black side pieces the LSB by White ruins my plans!
When you look at this position, White Bishop is a total monster of a piece!
I don’t like the move 7…Bd6
White & Black Knights seem even.
Both hitting the Center!
White Bishop looks like Monster!
Black Bishop looks like a Tall Pawn!
I don’t like Bd6 and I don’t like White having a Monster Light Square Bishop on e4!
I feel like the Light Square Bishop by White needs to be ELIMINATED!
I am going to create a Trade!
I just don’t know which Trading Sequence is Best!
7…Qf6 line I am exploring looks like below:
I doubt White would initiate the trade.
He would probably protect the Bishop.
Alternatively, I am liking the 7…Be6 line as well!
A very interesting/odd Bishop Maneuver!?
Wouldn’t you agree?
I think this strange little move has some merit!
My Computer Engine didn’t show 7…Be6 as an option. It wasn’t considered as a move.
Then when I manually played the move my computer engine changed its mind.
————————————
Now, it shows the move 7…Be6 as 3rd Best move!
Black Light Bishop is pretty useless!
White Light Bishop is extremely active hitting both the queen side & king side!
A very Textbook way of dealing with such a situation is to make a trade!
We trade off our inactive piece for our opponent active piece!
IF White is smart/good Chess player, They are not going to want to initiate this Trade!
I don’t know - It’s just what I am thinking.
Compadre_J έγραψε:
I think people on this Thread have dismissed the move 7…Qf6 to Quickly.
I like it as a move!
Honestly, I am torn between 7…Qf6 and 7…Be6.
No one has mentioned 7…Be6 on this thread either for some change reason.
In the above position, White Light Square Bishop is completely and utterly annoying!
Every time I try to assemble a formation I like with the Black side pieces the LSB by White ruins my plans!
When you look at this position, White Bishop is a total monster of a piece!
I don’t like the move 7…Bd6
White & Black Knights seem even.
Both hitting the Center!
White Bishop looks like Monster!
Black Bishop looks like a Tall Pawn!
I don’t like Bd6 and I don’t like White having a Monster Light Square Bishop on e4!
I feel like the Light Square Bishop by White needs to be ELIMINATED!
I am going to create a Trade!
I just don’t know which Trading Sequence is Best!
7…Qf6 line I am exploring looks like below:
I doubt White would initiate the trade.
He would probably protect the Bishop.
Alternatively, I am liking the 7…Be6 line as well!
A very interesting/odd Bishop Maneuver!?
Wouldn’t you agree?
I think this strange little move has some merit!
My Computer Engine didn’t show 7…Be6 as an option. It wasn’t considered as a move.
Then when I manually played the move my computer engine changed its mind.
————————————
Now, it shows the move 7…Be6 as 3rd Best move!
Black Light Bishop is pretty useless!
White Light Bishop is extremely active hitting both the queen side & king side!
A very Textbook way of dealing with such a situation is to make a trade!
We trade off our inactive piece for our opponent active piece!
IF White is smart/good Chess player, They are not going to want to initiate this Trade!
I don’t know - It’s just what I am thinking.
I have suggested previously 7...Be6 as ultra-solid, yet unambitious equalizer.
7...Qf6 isn't so bad, but 8.0-0 Bf5 doesn't quite work because of 9.Bxc6 Qxc6 10.Nxe5, or 9...bxc6 10.Nxe5.
The following game may suggest that Black has decent compensation, but actually after the accurate 13.d3! Black is in trouble.
IMPORTANT HAI