3. Qxf7+: New opining novelty that always wins

Sort:
colinsaul

It's a pity Bobby Fischer isn't around to benefit from your genius.

samtoyousir

Wow this guy is good. If I posted this thread people would be like haa that's funny. Nobody bites my troll lines...

colinsaul

My final post on this thread.

I think that 1.g4 is a far far better opening than your novelty.

elo123
colinsaul wrote:

My final post on this thread.

I think that 1.g4 is a far far better opening than your novelty.

I challenge you g4. You are on the way to destruction. You have no chance to survive make your time.

TheBlueKnight9
elo123 wrote:

Used it for the second time ever, and won yet again, this time even quicker:

 



You and your opponent played like crap. I can and allways will defeat you if you play this.

radmagichat

As great as the queen sac sounds.. I think moves like the lolli attack might work better or like the fried liver attack.. specially if your opponent hasn't studied the lines but you have. Then again, I could be wrong I mean to each his own :)

macer75

Really? No one got the Daeth reference? But it's so obvious!

NATHANKRISHNA

Let me share some jokes..

1.When apple fell on Newton's head ,he thought about its reason and later the law of gravitation was said to have been  discovered..

2.A boy in an Indian school was told by his teacher..Abraham Lincon studied at night unde rstreet lamps as he was very poor and later went on to become  the President of USA..The boy said," If you promise to make me the president of USA, I am also willing to study under the street lamp."

like wise here the OP  is under some wrong impressions taking a fluke

win against a low rated player to be a standard opening variation which

can give you guaranteed success..

MSC157

chessbrah (Eric Hansen) played a few bullet games (~5), always saccing the queen before move 5. He won all of them. :)

TheronG12
abrahampenrose написал:

I thought i was clever to win with 1. h4, 2.h5, etc. But OP's genius clearly outmatches mine.

 

Sac your queen for "positional" compensation on move three, why did i never think of that?

Are you going to try it? I want to see these games.