A Bust to the Sicilian Defense

Sort:
neveraskmeforadraw

I thought you meant that it was Black who has a plus score. My bad.

Thee_Ghostess_Lola

.....it wuz !

(just teezing....u know me)

staples13

i think I’ve lost every other game I’ve ever played against a titled player that wasn’t an Alapin except for one time against a WIM, but I am undefeated against titled players with the Alapin. They haven’t even managed a draw against me. The Alapin is unstoppable 

staples13
SpiderUnicorn wrote:
staples13 wrote:
SpiderUnicorn wrote:

@staples13, You have played rapid games before, so show is some of those Alapin games. It has been almost a year since your last rapid game. Why give up?

First you say my opponents are weak so then I crush a pair of NM’s with the Alapin, and now you’re all silent on the matter. The silence is deafening. 

I have said it over and over before, that anything can happen in blitz! 

I enjoyed rapid chess when I was learning the game and in a period or linear improvement, but now I just play chess for pure enjoyment, and I enjoy blitz and bullet much more than I enjoy rapid. By far the best time control is 3 minute no increment in my opinion. 

I encourage you to post your rapid games both with and against the Alapin on this thread though and we can collectively analyze them!

staples13
SpiderUnicorn wrote:
staples13 wrote:

i think I’ve lost every other game I’ve ever played against a titled player that wasn’t an Alapin except for one time against a WIM, but I am undefeated against titled players with the Alapin. They haven’t even managed a draw against me. The Alapin is unstoppable 

Go against a GM, or better yet, go against those NMs in a longer time control. We will see better games, not just from you, but also from them, since you actually have time to think about your moves.

I will play the Alapin against any GM at any time control if someone is able to arrange it. 

kindaspongey
staples13 wrote:

… I am undefeated against titled players with the Alapin. ...

Just to be clear, you are still talking about two bullet games against NMs?

kindaspongey
staples13 wrote:

... now I just play chess for pure enjoyment, and I enjoy blitz and bullet much more than I enjoy rapid. ...

Does that sort of activity strike you as "unbiased and analytical"?

kindaspongey

staples13 wrote: ... I encourage you to post your rapid games both with and against the Alapin on this thread though and we can collectively analyze them!

Is it likely to go like this discussion from about 25 days ago?

kindaspongey wrote:
staples13 wrote (August 29, 2018):

… Here's another 3 minute no increment blitz game showing black cracking under the constant pressure from white's pieces. … 1.e4 c5 2.c3 d5 3.exd5 Qxd5 4.d4 cxd4?! { Inaccurate becuase it gives white too much play } 5.cxd4 Nc6 6.Nf3 Bg4 … Clearly black can not take on d4. ...

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=3

"... White is winning after 1. e4 c5 2. c3 d5 3. exd5 Qxd5 4. d4 cxd4 5.cxd4 Nc6. ..." - staples13 (October 24, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=26

"Yes in that line 6. Nf3 is still winning" - staples13 (October 24, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=26

"In [1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.c3 d5 4.exd5 Qxd5 5.d4 cxd4 6.cxd4 e5 7.Nc3 Bb4 8.Bd2 Bxc3 9.Bxc3 e4 10.Ne5 Nxe5 11.dxe5 Ne7] ... Qe2 would've maintained the winning advantage" - staples13 (October 24, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=26

"[After 1.e4 c5 2.c3 d5 3.exd5 Qxd5 4.d4 Nc6 5.Nf3 cxd4 6.cxd4 e5 7.Nc3 Bb4 8.Bd2 Bxc3 9.Bxc3 e4 10.Ne5 Nxe5 11.dxe5 Ne7 12.Qe2 O-O 13.Rd1 Qc6,] 14.Rd6! { this was the move white missed. } 14...Qc7 15.Qxe4 Bf5 16.Qd4 Nc6 17.Qc5 Rac8 18.Bb5 { white is up a pawn and his position is clear;y far superior }" - staples13 (November 8, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=33

"Why would black play 14...Qc7? What if 14...Qa4 ...?" - littlesoldier123 (November 8, 2018)

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=33

... Are we going to see staples13 identify a winning improvement for White?

https://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/a-bust-to-the-sicilian-defense?page=75

staples13
pfren wrote:
staples13 έγραψε:
I will play the Alapin against any GM at any time control if someone is able to arrange it. 

 

I can arrange it for you, no problem.

It will cost you $40 for each 15'+10" rapid game, plus a fixed fee of $80 as a compensation for the mental anguish your quality of play will cause to him.

That’s very thoughtful Pfren, but maybe we can cut out the middleman. You me 3 minute blitz game with the Alapin. Do you accept?

GypsyGambit

staples13 you should test it against some decent players [2500 or so] first.
Formulating such statement based on games with 1500s really dumb. Just play 100games against GM's here on chess.com and then come back.


staples13
GypsyGambit wrote:

staples13 you should test it against some decent players [2500 or so] first.
Formulating such statement based on games with 1500s really dumb. Just play 100games against GM's here on chess.com and then come back.


I will gladly play 100 Alapins against a GM if you can set it up

staples13
kindaspongey wrote:
staples13 wrote:

… I am undefeated against titled players with the Alapin. ...

Just to be clear, you are still talking about two bullet games against NMs?

Yes

staples13
kindaspongey wrote:
staples13 wrote:

... now I just play chess for pure enjoyment, and I enjoy blitz and bullet much more than I enjoy rapid. ...

Does that sort of activity strike you as "unbiased and analytical"?

Yes

GypsyGambit

So you admit your statement was based just on your imaginations because you didn't play with any good players grin.png

Stop with excuses, it's your task to do because you want to prove sth, 
What's the problem? Many good players will play you for free here.

 

 

 

staples13
GypsyGambit wrote:

So you admit your statement was based just on your imaginations because you didn't play with any good players

Stop with excuses, it's your task to do because you want to prove sth, 
What's the problem? Many good players will play you for free here.

 

 

 

NM’s are not good players?? That’s a little disrespectful and just untrue. NM’s are better than 99.99% of chess players. No they’re not Kasparov, but that doesn’t make them not fantastic players 

Chicken_Monster
pfren wrote:
staples13 έγραψε:
I will play the Alapin against any GM at any time control if someone is able to arrange it. 

 

I can arrange it for you, no problem.

It will cost you $40 for each 15'+10" rapid game, plus a fixed fee of $80 as a compensation for the mental anguish your quality of play will cause to him.

 

"Like"

+ $10 to me and anyone else who has to do a manual "like" because we are devolving into FB territory. I would like to see this.

Also, can you post some WCC games where this was played, please?

 

 

staples13
The-Kremlin-Gremlin wrote:

sadly grandmasters continue to ignore the research and keep playing Sicilian

And yet they refuse to play it against me

staples13
SpiderUnicorn wrote:

Nah not really, his blitz is 2000+. Nevermind

Yeah it’s very strange, but pretty much everyone with a bullet rating of around 1700 has a blitz rating around 2000 here on chess.com. 

GypsyGambit
Play Arena Kings, titled players will be forced to play with you wink.png Stop making stupid excuses.



 

nikos8109

I think this topic has lost its objective... I believe one thing:  

 

@staples13, if you want to shut some mouths here, they way I see it, is play longer time limits and post the results into this thread. If you insist on playing 3 min games or less time limit, then this conversation will keep on until the end of days.