K-O-24-B-E wrote:
What is ur win rate with the london and do you recommend playing it in otb tournaments
The regular London can burn for eternity
A new ama about the jobava london
Sort:
May 16, 2021
0
#23
rychessmaster1 wrote:
little_guinea_pig wrote:
Can Black play "anti-Jobava" systems like the 3...Qb6 anti-London?
Not really any anti jobavas no
i don't mean ones that will rek a smart jobava player i mean one that would work against someone who just spams the first 6-7 moves (like most london players do)
I mean the “anti jobava” is this
but I’m not phased by it at all
May 16, 2021
0
#24
K-O-24-B-E wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
K-O-24-B-E wrote:
What is ur win rate with the london and do you recommend playing it in otb tournaments
The regular London can burn for eternity
What? So I should play normal london?
NO
May 16, 2021
0
#25
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
PrisonOfXanadu wrote:
Jobava London > London > Accelerated London
This man speaking facts
Idk I'm feeling like Jobava > Accelerated London > London
Fair
May 16, 2021
0
#26
rychessmaster1 wrote:
little_guinea_pig wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
little_guinea_pig wrote:
Can Black play "anti-Jobava" systems like the 3...Qb6 anti-London?
Not really any anti jobavas no
i don't mean ones that will rek a smart jobava player i mean one that would work against someone who just spams the first 6-7 moves (like most london players do)
I mean the “anti jobava” is this
but I’m not phased by it at all
the knight on a6 doesn't look too great. this is the Anti system?
May 16, 2021
0
#27
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
May 16, 2021
0
#28
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
little_guinea_pig wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
little_guinea_pig wrote:
Can Black play "anti-Jobava" systems like the 3...Qb6 anti-London?
Not really any anti jobavas no
i don't mean ones that will rek a smart jobava player i mean one that would work against someone who just spams the first 6-7 moves (like most london players do)
I mean the “anti jobava” is this
but I’m not phased by it at all
the knight on a6 doesn't look too great. this is the Anti system?
This is what most people decide on yes
But whites fine and I have some stuff that gives black a bad time
May 16, 2021
0
#29
JackRoach wrote:
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
I think the entire point of the Jobava at its core is to play nb5 fried liver style
May 16, 2021
0
#30
JackRoach wrote:
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
The London is slow trying to play Nf3 Nd2 c3 Be2 O-O
Jobava you can immediately go for things like Nb5 or Nf3-e5 or f3-g4-h4 if the bishop comes to f5
May 16, 2021
0
#31
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
I think the entire point of the Jobava at its core is to play nb5 fried liver style
But, in the example he posted the knight just went to the edge to defend.
May 16, 2021
0
#32
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
I think the entire point of the Jobava at its core is to play nb5 fried liver style
Nb5 is only the idea sometimes but the threat also gets some players to play a6 or c6 on move 3, a slow move
May 16, 2021
0
#33
rychessmaster1 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
The London is slow trying to play Nf3 Nd2 c3 Be2 O-O
Jobava you can immediately go for things like Nb5 or Nf3-e5 or f3-g4-h4 if the bishop comes to f5
I can't visualize that. Can you post an example?
May 16, 2021
0
#34
JackRoach wrote:
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
I think the entire point of the Jobava at its core is to play nb5 fried liver style
But, in the example he posted the knight just went to the edge to defend.
But that’s not any fun
May 16, 2021
0
#35
JackRoach wrote:
rychessmaster1 wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
The London is slow trying to play Nf3 Nd2 c3 Be2 O-O
Jobava you can immediately go for things like Nb5 or Nf3-e5 or f3-g4-h4 if the bishop comes to f5
I can't visualize that. Can you post an example?
How about one of each
May 16, 2021
0
#36
rychessmaster1 wrote:
DaBabysSideTing wrote:
JackRoach wrote:
Why is it ok to just refuse to move the c-pawn in the beginning?
Also, can you post how it is an attacking opening and not just London with the horse on a different square?
I think the entire point of the Jobava at its core is to play nb5 fried liver style
Nb5 is only the idea sometimes but the threat also gets some players to play a6 or c6 on move 3, a slow move
personally I dont have a problem playing c6 in the Jobava because I can get semi slav-ish ideas in it. I think
May 16, 2021
0
#37
c6 in the jobava pretty much forces black to go for the Bf5 lines if he wants to be active, walking right into the f3-g4
May 16, 2021
0
#39
Pretty much
Black has to be really passive if he wants to avoid a quick attack from white
What makes the Jobava London better than the Veresov attack?
The bishop on f4 is way more active than the bishop on g5 and it also doesn’t allow a French transposition by force