accurate defence to fried liver?

will you people stop it with the random variations of the two knights??? i dont care, i already know that there are lines for black such as the morphy Na5, the fritz Nd4, or the Traxler Bc5, and I've analyzed them a bit myself. but point, read the title of this forum. do you have any input on blacks defence to the fried liver attack by white? if not, please stop crowding this topic and start another to discuss that line

allowing 9. Nxc2+ as a gambit then should be considered inferior?
Well, in #28 Black wins.....

Harris vs. Sneaky Pete (computer)
I really don't like White's 14th move here.
Exchanging pieces is the last thing White wants to do.
White's advantage lies in his attacking chances.
So let's bring out more forces!
Exchanging pieces only relieves Black's game and allows his slight material advantage to be more felt.
14. Re1 continue the pressure and maintains the initiative for the time being.
--cm

agreed, i was actually thinking the same thing. as a general rule, in an instance where a player trades material for an attacking position, trading off attacking pieces is backwards play

Best analysis. Look no further...
Fiveofswords wrote:
i dont know, after 6. Nxf7 its not necessarily that easy for white to break through actually if black does some fairly simple stuff...
You should look at the Traxler Counter attack. Although the lines are "messy" Your calculations also gave to be pinpoint accurate. It's worth looking at though.

I set up the position up to 5. exd5 (1. e4 e5 2. Cf3 Cc6 3. Ac4 Cf6 4. Cg5 d5 5. exd5...) and I let stockfish to finish the match. The result was a win for black with a beautiful knight, bishop, king mate. The sequence is:
I don't know any defense, but it always goes good with onions.