No idea. I tried saying that earlier, but the 2 didn't listen.
Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch
Sort:
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:
The parham thread was locked because this site stifles creativity.
We've decided the scotch sucks because 4. Qh4 wins a pawn for black.
and it wins full compensation in activity:)
keep on denying :P
BruceBenedict wrote:
Just got a look at the galleys for the new ECO. They're calling 1.e4 e5 2.Qh5 "The Fruit Attack." I guess because that chess engine Fruit defaults to it
See, even the most advanced chess engines see that the Parham is the best.
I don't see why you'd call it the Parham defence, considering in all of the lines you posted white is destroying black.
The_Gavinator wrote:
I don't see why you'd call it the Parham defence, considering in all of the lines you posted white is destroying black.
For how long do you intend to keep this up? At least snakes trolling on these forums is genuine entertainment, what you two virgins are doing is just beyond sad.
Are you so neglected irl that you have to constantly try to gather attention here in the most annoying manner one could think of?
If you want to keep trolling please go gather some charisma. Though I get the feeling that if you were an actually likeable person instead of the talentless pathethic mess you are now you wouldnt be wasting everyones time like this.
I do hope you learned a little chess from this thread and I do hope that you'll grow up some time soon. I'm genuinely disheartened by the fact that every time I see you post I get an mental image of you chatting with whatup on msn going ''lOLOLOLOL I TROLL :;P:P:;PP:;:;PP;:P''
Everytime I see you posting, I see you in a little shack with about 5 coats on, typing with one hand and trying to fend off the bears with the other.
I still don't understand how I'm trolling if you can't fight against it. Do you people consider being good at chess trolling?
See you do that because you are scared of the Parham. If you win, whatupyodog looks dumb. If you lose, you say "Oh I wasn't trying LOLZ". Classic wuss tactics.
alexlaw wrote:
you should have seen how far my king went in the opening.
See exactly my point. You don't try so that when you lose you have an excuse.
And we don't learn calculus in America because we do more important things like watching movies and found poems.
Speak for yourself. I know several Americans who are beyond calculus in high school...
IB is easy, it's probably different over in China. Math is simple anyways, but Public Schools focus on the important topics like reading comic books.
Studying geography might help, a bit.
? USCF:2227. That dummy just read it wrong. And how does IB have anything to do with chess? IB you have like three classes a day, and two knights to do homework. I'd go there if the entire school wasn't full of shady kids.
VladBGhita wrote:
Sorry, I just can't believe anything a 1227 USCF says. LOL, that's enough for me to place you in a special category of mine, namely, players who want to improve, but cannot, since they have a complete disregard for theory.
Theory = knowledge of hundreds of GM's for you to learn, understand, and play. And yet people play stuff like the Nimzo-Larsen or the Sokolsky opening. Why, why, why, Delilah?
Once again you disparage the lower rating groups. At the moment I believe he is technically higher rated than you - at least his rating is established, but you seem to brag about your provisional rating all the time. You have to play 25 games for it to count now, vlad. Go IMPALE something.
He didn't read it wrong, your uscf rating is 1227, check the website.
When did you learn calculus? And a good american school is an oxymoron.
whatupyodog2-5 wrote:
NachtWulf, yes we are probably the smartest in our school, we have already taken every math class but calculus and will take it next year as juniors.
I'm taking BC as a sophomore, and I'm not near the smartest in my school. In fact, I know a couple people at my school who finished differential equations sophomore year. This is why I feel vlad shouldn't be a jerk to someone saying their only 16, I've learned as much as many adults would through college and my age is insignificant, what was it vlad said to me now? "Shut up, as your only 16 I don't believe you can contribute positively to the site" - something like that. I think vlad's the one who can't contribute.
Vlad - you asked "Who are you and what do you want?"
I am a sophomore in highschool who has had enough experience with snobby rich kids to recognize that you act the exact, same, bratty way. I don't like that, and I want you to stop. Not just to me, but to everyone. It might not be that you have more money, but you just are better, smarter, and greater than everyone else in your mind. I don't like that attitude, reminds me of middle schoolers.
Hmmm, perhaps you should shut up because you act like you're 9.
Also, it is fun to say Vlad the IMPALER
im actually considering making a thread called "
the real Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch thread
because as a member very interested in the mieses variation im getting tired of checking this thread and finding nothing but parhamspam. whats wrong with posting about the parham in the parhamthread? why here?