Aggressive Response to 4...Nf6 in the Scotch

lol post 1000 was about 50 posts ago dummy.

Is he talking about the opening I posted?

That's not something I made up. It's one of the mainlines.

Idk what you're talking about, there is only one line that we've found where black isn't crushed, and we took a poll and most people preferred white in that line.

No it wasn't on the Parham, it was on a position. I switched the colors so it would discourage trolls. We had 5 votes (including jetfighter) for Parham, 2 against.

No it was the exact same position, reversed colors. It really shows how much all of you like to troll on the Parham, when if you actually looked you'd like it.

Actually, I recently just proved that the pro-parham site was right. Some of the major trolls chose they liked the position the Parham gave, when they were shown a Parham position, but not told what it was. Jetfighter is the perfect example.

Why dont we all play a tournament where only the parham is played and see how it comes out? 

BTW, what is the definition of trolling? It seems to be used rather loosely.

Back to the Scotch. If your looking for something "aggressive" why not play the scotch gambit. 

Trolling is pretty much attacking something without cause.

I think I've finally got it. You all are just super-trolls. I'm never going to convince you about the Parham, because you are such large trolls that you are never going to admit something moving the queen out is good. I've polled the people and they think the Parham is good, and when they are told it is the Parham, they immediately switch sides. There's been so many failures, and there's been one reasonable line out of THOUSANDS of comments. And people agree they think white has a better position. Most of you probably won't read this, and will just assume this is bad anyways because you are trolls.

Christiansoldier is one of the worst trolls, he thinks this is bad and can't go 10 moves without hanging material.

Is this just based on rank?

This is exactly what the opening books state to play.

Apparently taking the pawn is a crime in opening theory.

Amazingly, this is exactly how I feel. Vlad is a good player, but can be extremely annoying. The others are simply people that The Gavinator and whatupyodog hate.

Whatupyodog, if you feel you blundered I would be willing to play a rematch. Hopefully this time you don't lose 3 pieces plus pawns with the unstoppable parham that was rather easily stopped.

When you're using rybka it helps a bit.

I looked at rybka after the game, as you can tell I played very few of the moves given by rybka. Would you like me to analyze my moves vs rybkas moves?

Rybka gives 6... d5 or 6...Nb4 as best but I played 6...0-0

Rybka gives 9... d5 as winning but I played 9... d6

Rybka gives 15...Be6 but I was planning on playing 15...c6

etc. Practically everymove that isn't forced was different from rybka and my game. However, I did use the knowledge that I have learned on these forums on how to pwn the forum.

UNLESS YOU HAVE PROOF THAT I CHEATED YOU CANNOT SAY THAT I DID. ALSO, PUBLICLY DECLARING SOMEONE AS A CHEATER IS AGAINST THE RULES. I WOULD LIKE A MOD TO DELETE GAVINATORS COMMENT, AND IF HE INSULTS ME ONE MORE TIME I WILL REPORT HIM.