You can't really be aggressive per se without some sort of mistake by your opponent for you to pounce on, no matter how small of a mistake it may be. If you try to be an aggressive player by making wild threats just because of your mood or mindset, you'll wind up in trouble on the board. That being said, I too love the Scotch. There are a handful of options as black that may be what you're looking for: the Scandinavian Gambit 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Nf6 3. c4 c6. White does not have to play c4 in order for you to play c6, but that is how the gambit originated IIRC. You give a pawn for rapid development, I've both won spectacularly and lost miserably using it, mostly in blitz time controls. Another is the Budapest, 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e5. The Sicilian has a few lines that are very, very sharp but they involve a lot of theory as well. For instance, the Sveshnikov, is double-edged with chances for both sides. It's all a matter of personal taste. Browse through openings online and find what suits you.
Any aggressive Black Openings that can be consistently played?
You can't really be aggressive per se without some sort of mistake by your opponent for you to pounce on, no matter how small of a mistake it may be. If you try to be an aggressive player by making wild threats just because of your mood or mindset, you'll wind up in trouble on the board.
This is of course correct, I would suggest the French for several reasons: 1/ You will have to face it often as white anyway 2/ 'Fears' about the Exchange variation are just that. It's easier to win from an equal position than it is the usual slight plus white has anyway. 3/In order to push for a win against the French, white has make concessions himself. The French is a tough nut to crack without white leaving himself exposed somewhere, and this is the game that might appeal to you.
Try the Schliemann Gambit against 1e4 and the Albin Gambit against 1d4. They both unbalance the position, which is what you want, and are fun to play. Nigel Davies is a grandmaster who has a book about these openings called "Gambiteer" that I really enjoy reading.
However, don't use either if being a pawn down while playing Black is a concern for you.
I have recently found the Scotch to be my preferred opening for white and i'm looking for a tactics based, aggressive opening for black that can be consistently played.
https://www.chess.com/livechess/game?id=2643368789
You should probably learn the basics first, before wanting to claim to be "agressive" and "tactical"
You get tactics from sound stategic play. If youre not following sound strategy, youre not going to get tactics, unless your opponent messes up. And playing "Hope Chess" is not how you improve.
the Albin Gambit against 1d4.
1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 now what?
the Albin Gambit against 1d4.
1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 now what?
That was a game really late at night that I was messing around with, I can clearly see mistakes and blunders I made in it upon reflection. If you look at a couple of my games from different days you will see that it isn't a common theme and you will also see that I will go on losing and winning streaks regularly. I want to create stability in my good play by playing stable openings and when I am on my game I will get around 0.40 on computer analysis with one mistake at the most.
I agree about French defense.
French defense is probably the most uncompromising opening. Nothing is as it looks.
The main advantage is the many choices Black has against everything white throws up to him. There is no defense with so many playable unorthodox moves.
Here is an example:
The second advantage is what Ziggy mentioned. Indeed White has to expose himself in order to create winning chances but that also gives Black a lot of winning chances.
The third advantage is that very few novices and amateurs understand French. They rarely understand anything except "bad bishop" or " drawish French exchange".
The 4th advantage is that there are no anti-French lines , except the French exchange that is not a problem at all. Why it's not a problem? Because it's one of the lines where it is easy to create winning chances against players that have no idea what to do and most belong in this category.
Now the disadvantages:
One is understanding.
You can't play or appreciate French defense if you can't appreciate some subtle points. Theory is not so demanding , you can avoid most of it if you want but you need to study a lot of games before you learn to stay calm against White's attacks on k-side. Black often has an uncastled king and a lot of other problems but you are never out of dynamic chances to create counterplay.
The second is endgames.
If you can't convert a middlegame advantage to a winning endgame you will lose a lot of points. Since winning from attacks can't happen all the time , endgame technique is important in every opening and maybe even more in French defense. On the bright side , investing on endgame technique is the best long-term investment for a chessplayer.It's the one thing that becomes more and more important the better you become.
Is French good vs no e4 openings. I like playing vs e4, e5, since it creates wild games and it is fun. But against d4, I play the old Benoni with success, but want to switch to something more solid (is French good). Against, all the other white openings (no e4 or d4), I just try to avoid their traps, because at my level that is all my opponents try to do. So, I try to avoid very obvious replies, with other logical more safe alternatives. Can I replace all those various first moves, with 1... e6?
French is neither good nor bad against "no e4 openings" because you simply can't play it against non-e4 openings. The French Defense is an opening against e4, that's it.
if you want a solid defense against d4. study the Nimzo.
French is neither good nor bad against "no e4 openings" because you simply can't play it against non-e4 openings. The French Defense is an opening against e4, that's it.
if you want a solid defense against d4. study the Nimzo.
thanks, but Nimzo is very specific. I mean my opponent could play many different moves (on move 2 and 3), resulting to different openings, before it reaches to a Nimzo-Indian. Therefore, Nimzo could be an answer only to: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3. Maybe, in higher levels, it is a pretty good and frequent answer, but at my lower level, the opponents play many different moves, or at least that is what I think.
yeah, but there just is no black opening against everything, sorry 
I agree about French defense.
French defense is probably the most uncompromising opening. Nothing is as it looks.
The main advantage is the many choices Black has against everything white throws up to him. There is no defense with so many playable unorthodox moves.
Here is an example:
The second advantage is what Ziggy mentioned. Indeed White has to expose himself in order to create winning chances but that also gives Black a lot of winning chances.
The third advantage is that very few novices and amateurs understand French. They rarely understand anything except "bad bishop" or " drawish French exchange".
The 4th advantage is that there are no anti-French lines , except the French exchange that is not a problem at all. Why it's not a problem? Because it's one of the lines where it is easy to create winning chances against players that have no idea what to do and most belong in this category.
Now the disadvantages:
One is understanding.
You can't play or appreciate French defense if you can't appreciate some subtle points. Theory is not so demanding , you can avoid most of it if you want but you need to study a lot of games before you learn to stay calm against White's attacks on k-side. Black often has an uncastled king and a lot of other problems but you are never out of dynamic chances to create counterplay.
The second is endgames.
If you can't convert a middlegame advantage to a winning endgame you will lose a lot of points. Since winning from attacks can't happen all the time , endgame technique is important in every opening and maybe even more in French defense. On the bright side , investing on endgame technique is the best long-term investment for a chessplayer.It's the one thing that becomes more and more important the better you become.
Is French good vs no e4 openings. I like playing vs e4, e5, since it creates wild games and it is fun. But against d4, I play the old Benoni with success, but want to switch to something more solid (is French good). Against, all the other white openings (no e4 or d4), I just try to avoid their traps, because at my level that is all my opponents try to do. So, I try to avoid very obvious replies, with other logical more safe alternatives. Can I replace all those various first moves, with 1... e6?
French does not exist if White doesn't play e4 in either the first or the second move(in rare cases even later) but 1...e6 with or without a q-side fiancheto is more or less universal and can be played against all reasonable White opening systems. It will most likely transpose to Queen's gambit or Catalan in most of the cases. Both these openings don't need much theory(if you are clever enough to avoid the heavy analysed lines) and they rely mostly in understanding plus they create important positions(isolated pawn , hanging pawns , minority attack , etc.) with universal value that will help you improve faster than playing openings that create unique positions (like for example Dutch). That is why openings like Queen's gambit are highly recommended for novices but don't make the mistake to underestimate them. Kasparov has said that "Queen's gambit is the choice of World champions with both colors".
Queen's gambit is certainly one of the most important openings to study and understand and one of the huge mistake many novices do is that they ignore it because it is "drawish" and "boring"(well known terms used by novices when they don't uderstand something).
Here are some examples of how 1...e6 can be implemented against almost everything.
Thanks very much, interesting thoughts. Will probably try some. All novices (including me) are fascinated by quick traps and games at my low level are full of cheap opening tricks and not very solid openings (I am guilty too, of course).
I have recently found the Scotch to be my preferred opening for white and i'm looking for a tactics based, aggressive opening for black that can be consistently played.