Any aggressive gambits I should try out with white?

Bobby bojangles is the type of guy to read 1 message soo he wont have 69 messages.

"i bLuNdErEd a rOoK bUt iLl cAlL iT a gAmBiT" - bobby bojangles

page 13

so its elitist to say to someone who says "xx opening is good" that its bad

and if anyone dares to say so, they are unwelcoming to new players

no lol?

thats just informing the truth and if a new player saw it, will they go "oh no i cant say my opinion here i must bow down aah" or something similar

what if that person honestly thought that the tennison is good?

helping others is bad nowadays, and apparently thinking that its good is wrong?

I agree

slaj

Mmm, I always play this line and don't go for the "tricks". Keres played 4.Nc3 here, followed by Bc4 with good results.

Fair enough actually

the naka-WHATEVER gambit is refuted im pretty sure

This was resolved. Please stop instigating man. If a 400 thinks the ICBM is good, who cares? They'll win games until the opening isn't working anymore. It's not about saying it's bad, it's about saying it in a way that defeats the purpose of this thread. I asked for "Aggressive gambits". Which includes dubious openings."X Is refuted so I can just say 'That's refuted shut up' in the future". is not a good mindset, believe it or not. There's no reason a 400 needs to know the ICBM is bad. THEY'RE 400... This thread isn't for main repertoire suggestions. It's just to stockpile good and bad openings. I find myself having to almost retype my first message but with highlighting the parts you had trouble with. Please read what this message says before replying.
A 400 doesn't care what's refuted and they shouldn't care either. It's not welcoming to new players to come in and tell them that their only suggestion that has a relatively high chance of being just for fun and not even part of their main repertoire is bad and that it's "simply refuted with this wonderful line that crushes all your hopes and dreams. Hehe I'm so cool".
Would it be reasonable to tell a 400 "Go learn the Sicilian"? The only things a 400 should focus on is 1. Being principled, 2. Not hanging stuff, and 3. Having fun.
None of us are gonna be GMs at any point unless you happen to be a super young super high rated player so why do we act like we need to grind for the GM title so much? Do you not play chess because you enjoy it? Chess is a game. It's meant to be fun.

EXACTALLY!!!!

CHESS IS MEANT TO BE FUN STOP PLAYING SYSTEM OPENINGS

LMAOOOOOOOO I used to play the London and now I play the Vienna so that hurt me a bit on a deep spiritual level but yeah you've got a point lmao

I seem to remember somebody on your page saying they never get past 1000 though?

Also is any loss of a rook never a gambit? I mean...

According to your oh-so amazing human analysis here, you should be able to see that black is down a queen. I'm not saying Bobby Bojangle's gambit is good, it's just a rook gambit isn't as bad as you think.

By the way, since you think I'm a troll, how much Elo do I need to not be a troll?

And YES, this message is on-topic. That board over there is a legitimate gambit. Not to mention top Stockfish line. If you're gonna tell me this gambit is bad, tell it to Stockfish.

yes

Better to start with Bc4. Here's the difference:

Muzio gambit

Oh yeah, this too.

And guess what? Gambit accepted, +11.3, gambit declined, 0.00.

Are system openings not fun?

 e2

OF COURSE THEY ARENT! YOU TAKING ALL THE FUN OUT OF THE POSITION JUST TO PLAY A DULL SYSTEM AND DO PASSIVE THINGS WHEN THE OPPONENT EXPECTED A SHARP AND TACTICAL GAME! STOP PLAYING SYSTEMS!