You know you could have this:
but choose this
Bro makes the line shorter and shorter, next you're just going to say this:
"YoU rEaLlY pReFeR tHiS"
"OvEr ThIs?"
This argument’s getting a little bit heated, you guys need to chill a little
Just say “I don’t like the Rousseau because it’s unsound” and “I like the Rousseau because it’s a dynamic sideline that leads to a more open game” or something of the sort, it doesn’t matter. Just leave it be, there’s no reason to make the argument this heated.
A really fun one to play is the ICBM, heres a video on it
ah yes the icbm
where you sacrifice a pawn to win the queen
and if your opponent doesn’t fall for it you’re in a terrible position
Why do people insist on playing garbage just for the dopamine rush of “oh wow he fell for it 🤣”? Play an actual opening, play actual chess. GothamChess hates the Ruy Lopez but he literally recommends the Englund Gambit. Almost no opening traps are sound compared to legitimate openings.
You already answered your own question with that. Those traps tend to be snappy, flashy, and quick. Thats what attracts a type of player. Most of the times they will just get away until a plateau. I am not talking about the quirky "oh I am 2500+ and still use these" people as they could beat a person with piece odds anyways so their point is moot there.
Yeah, basically.
Its more fun than effective for the most part, if your looking for a laugh then its perfect. but dont do it if you want to win more games
A really fun one to play is the ICBM, heres a video on it
ah yes the icbm
where you sacrifice a pawn to win the queen
and if your opponent doesn’t fall for it you’re in a terrible position
Why do people insist on playing garbage just for the dopamine rush of “oh wow he fell for it 🤣”? Play an actual opening, play actual chess. GothamChess hates the Ruy Lopez but he literally recommends the Englund Gambit. Almost no opening traps are sound compared to legitimate openings.
You already answered your own question with that. Those traps tend to be snappy, flashy, and quick. Thats what attracts a type of player. Most of the times they will just get away until a plateau. I am not talking about the quirky "oh I am 2500+ and still use these" people as they could beat a person with piece odds anyways so their point is moot there.
Yeah, basically.
Its more fun than effective for the most part, if your looking for a laugh then its perfect. but dont do it if you want to win more games
Ok, just double-checking. I thought it was actually part of your main repertoire lol
but yeah it is a fun trap if you manage to actually get it
A really fun one to play is the ICBM, heres a video on it
ah yes the icbm
where you sacrifice a pawn to win the queen
and if your opponent doesn’t fall for it you’re in a terrible position
Why do people insist on playing garbage just for the dopamine rush of “oh wow he fell for it 🤣”? Play an actual opening, play actual chess. GothamChess hates the Ruy Lopez but he literally recommends the Englund Gambit. Almost no opening traps are sound compared to legitimate openings.
You already answered your own question with that. Those traps tend to be snappy, flashy, and quick. Thats what attracts a type of player. Most of the times they will just get away until a plateau. I am not talking about the quirky "oh I am 2500+ and still use these" people as they could beat a person with piece odds anyways so their point is moot there.
Yeah, basically.
Its more fun than effective for the most part, if your looking for a laugh then its perfect. but dont do it if you want to win more games
Ok, just double-checking. I thought it was actually part of your main repertoire lol
but yeah it is a fun trap if you manage to actually get it
Speaking of traps, here's one that actually is still good for you even if your opponent doesn't fall for it.
A really fun one to play is the ICBM, heres a video on it
ah yes the icbm
where you sacrifice a pawn to win the queen
and if your opponent doesn’t fall for it you’re in a terrible position
Why do people insist on playing garbage just for the dopamine rush of “oh wow he fell for it 🤣”? Play an actual opening, play actual chess. GothamChess hates the Ruy Lopez but he literally recommends the Englund Gambit. Almost no opening traps are sound compared to legitimate openings.
You already answered your own question with that. Those traps tend to be snappy, flashy, and quick. Thats what attracts a type of player. Most of the times they will just get away until a plateau. I am not talking about the quirky "oh I am 2500+ and still use these" people as they could beat a person with piece odds anyways so their point is moot there.
Yeah, basically.
Its more fun than effective for the most part, if your looking for a laugh then its perfect. but dont do it if you want to win more games
Ok, just double-checking. I thought it was actually part of your main repertoire lol
but yeah it is a fun trap if you manage to actually get it
not at all, its really inconsistent and the scandinavian usually isnt played anyway, ive only got it to work once but it was beautiful. Its like the Bongcloud, you dont play it because its good, you play it because its funny and stupid at the same time
A really fun one to play is the ICBM, heres a video on it
ah yes the icbm
where you sacrifice a pawn to win the queen
and if your opponent doesn’t fall for it you’re in a terrible position
Why do people insist on playing garbage just for the dopamine rush of “oh wow he fell for it 🤣”? Play an actual opening, play actual chess. GothamChess hates the Ruy Lopez but he literally recommends the Englund Gambit. Almost no opening traps are sound compared to legitimate openings.
You already answered your own question with that. Those traps tend to be snappy, flashy, and quick. Thats what attracts a type of player. Most of the times they will just get away until a plateau. I am not talking about the quirky "oh I am 2500+ and still use these" people as they could beat a person with piece odds anyways so their point is moot there.
Yeah, basically.
Its more fun than effective for the most part, if your looking for a laugh then its perfect. but dont do it if you want to win more games
Ok, just double-checking. I thought it was actually part of your main repertoire lol
but yeah it is a fun trap if you manage to actually get it
not at all, its really inconsistent and the sicilian usually isnt played anyway, ive only got it to work once but it was beautiful. Its like the Bongcloud, you dont play it because its good, you play it because its funny and stupid at the same time
Scandinavian*
Sicilian is 1… c5
yeah it’s for the memes lol
FOR THE MEMES
except you don't lose.
Bro makes the line shorter and shorter, next you're just going to say this:
"YoU rEaLlY pReFeR tHiS"
"OvEr ThIs?"
Lol. i actually picked both positions from the end of move number 5 of each opening, to make it fair.
You need to check your openings.
This argument’s getting a little bit heated, you guys need to chill a little
Lol. I'm chilling. I thought it was funny. I come back and Ahmed is fully raging, blood-boiling, veins popping, mad. 🤣
FOR THE MEMES
except you don't lose.
Das a funny meme brooo
Ahmed does sound like a raging lunatic that is chained in some dungeon and somehow got a hold of this forum indeed
Bro makes the line shorter and shorter, next you're just going to say this:
"YoU rEaLlY pReFeR tHiS"
"OvEr ThIs?"
Lol. i actually picked both positions from the end of move number 5 of each opening, to make it fair.
You need to check your openings.
And it just so happened that move 5 is the point where you said black is dead lost on the original thread? "You need to check your openings", ok here, I'll make it better. Here, watch.
over this
Yeah, so... you're going to need to go deeper because you're doing things you said yourself shouldn't. We all know the laughing emoji is something you use when I make a point and you need a cover-up for something, tell me wrong.
this answers the debate
its unsound
+1.1, what my engine says. If you put a engine on really high depths it'll say things like +4.5 assuming white can keep up a best move streak for 60 moves. If they can carry out every single best move, either they're cheating or they're memorizing lines, which is hard to do for 110 moves.
We all know the laughing emoji is something you use when I make a point and you need a cover-up for something, tell me wrong.
Damn I'm busted. You guys already knew? I was just coping with the epic hack that is the Rousseau Gambit 😭
If they can carry out every single best move, either they're cheating or they're memorizing lines, which is hard to do for 110 moves.
Lol, you literally said before that you play these openings by memorising engine lines.
I'm sorry you got upset that I criticised your favourite opening @chainlincfence.
I'm sorry I have to point out that yall are still saying fxe4 is the best move against d4 and that once again just like your opposer you're shortening some of the lines. In example 2, Pressure gets released even if it's not the best line.
Yeah, even if it's +1.1, that's because fxe4 and not exd4. Except, where is that squeezing you were talking about? Where again?
Bruh look
Your queen is on d6 and none of your pieces have anywhere useful to go. Best move here is Qe6. That's how miserable the position is. This is like +2.0.
After exd4
Look how sad your pieces are.
Bro litteraly made the mistake he keeps telling his opposers to not make. "I guide others to a gift I cannot obtain" should be your motto. YOU CUT THE LINE SHORT GODDAMIT.
You said they were sad right? right?