Attacking the Vienna game with 3...f5?!

Sort:
Avatar of Random_Carnage

I've had some great results using this surprise weapon for Black with 67% wins.

Here's a game I just finished that shows the power of Black's position after just a few moves.

It is White that needs to tread carefully...

Avatar of pfren

Any opening is extremely powerful if the opponent plays moves like 5.exf5.

You should be more concerned about getting a large advantage and then throwing it all away (plus some) after 10...h6?

Avatar of Random_Carnage

You're a ray of sunshine, ain't ya?

Good job I wasn't playing Magnus, eh? I'd most probably have lost!

Avatar of Rayan-00

عتتتت

Avatar of Sussyguy4890
Why nge2?
Avatar of BeatleFred

What should white worry about if he played the stronger move 4. Bxg8 instead, followed by Qh5 ch.

Avatar of yetanotheraoc
BeatleFred wrote:

What should white worry about if he played the stronger move 4. Bxg8 instead, followed by Qh5 ch.

4 Bxg8 is not a good move. The same can happen in the Calabrese Counter Gambit , 1 e4 e5 2 Bc4 f5 3 Bxg8 , and in another Vienna line 1 e4 e5 2 Nc3 Bc5 3 f4 Bxg1. In each case, taking the undeveloped knight with the developed bishop, in order to run around with the queen trying to win a pawn, is dubious. And it doesn't even win a pawn.

Avatar of BeatleFred

Ok, thanks for the reply/analysis. Reminds me very much of the Schliemann vs the Ruy Lopez with 3..f5 instead of a6, leading to similar positions.