berliner variation fritz

Sort:
sloughterchess
Conquiscador wrote:

11...Be7 is the main line from my understanding and black is doing fine.


sloughterchess

One of the problems facing the Fritz player in the 8...Ne6 variation, is that he has to make progress. Little progress can be demonstrated in the 11...Be7 line and White just holds the pawn. The 11...f5 variation underscores one of the chronic problems facing Black---an inferior endgame. The old timers thought that a pawn majority on the Queenside was close to winning. Here, White just transitions to a slightly favorable middlegame with the only side with any real chances to achieve a plus in the position. He has three plusses: 1)Better pawn structure, 2)Good prospects of creating a passed pawn on the Queenside, 3)The undermining move b4 going after the support of the passed pawn on d4 will be a recurring threat. Together they point to a significant long-term advantage to White.

Ask any Grandmaster, "Which would you prefer to play, White's position or the Black position?" I predict that the overwhelming majority of players would prefer to play White. Also, there is no requirement to give up the pawn, but White's prospects are excellent here. Perhaps other post readers can figure out ways to shut down the attack and still keep the pawn.

Conquistador

Everyone make way for your teacher, the Great Sloughter!  He decrees that the Two Knights Defence is refuted!  He is greater than all the GMs who stand against his thinking!

"So let it be written, so let it be done."

Conquistador

Sloughter, I have someone you should meet here.  Remember Gambit from chesspub?  Well there is a member here named ChessTrainer who is an advocate of 1.Na3 and believes it to be the greatest opening, over 1.e4 and everything else.  He named it after himself and nicknamed it Excalibur.  You two can have an interesting discussion about it.

Check out the thread

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/na3gtgt-a00-tapel-tomasopening-launch?lc=1#last_comment

Conquistador

Sloughter

I feel bad for sloughter ArKhieN_

Conquistador

Conquistador

I think you are the student son.

sloughterchess

You are right! I am a student of Caissa, the Goddess of chess! Your efforts at humor are decidely better than your attempts as a chess theoretician. Chess.com readers, just check out Conquiscador's contributions in the Wilkes Barre/Traxler thread.

Conquistador

Well, I have to say that your plan of 7.BxK PxB 8.Kt-KB3 is your only new contribution to established theory and it is your best.  Black is struggling in that line.  Other than that, a lot of your experiments are null and void as you do not bother to look up the lines as the refuter.  You just post one line and say black is in trouble.

sloughterchess

For months my critics have downplayed the significance of my contribution in the Berliner Gambit, claiming that Black could improve on Berliner's play with 4.Ng5 d5 5.exd5 Nd4 6.c3 b5 7.Bf1 Nxd5 8.Ne4!?, but this is no better than the Berliner Gambit as the following analysis shows:

8.Ne4 Ne6 9.Bxb5ch Bd7 10.Ba6!! & White now controls the important d3 square and can defend g2 as well.

Here is what doesn't work:

10...Ndf4 11.O-O Bc6 12.Re1 Nd3 13.Re3 Nef4 14.Qf3! Nxc1 (what else?) 15.Qxf4! The point being that 15...exf4?? 16.Nf6 doublecheck mate! so White is better.

or 10...f5 11.Ng3 Nc5 12.Bc4 Nb6 13.Bf1 e4 (f4 14.Qh5ch+/-) 14.d4 exd4 e.p.15.Bxd3 Nxd3 16.Qxd3 Qe7ch 17.Ne2 +/-.

Finally, here is an idea of GM Lev Alburt:

10.Ba6 f5 11.Ng3 Nc5 12.Bc4 Nb6 13.Bf1 Qe7 14.b4 Nb7 15.Ba6! Nd6 16.O-O f4 17.Nh1 Qg5 18.d4 Bc6 (Bh3 19.Ng3!+-) 19.f3 +/- (see diagram below)

sloughterchess
sloughterchess

Here is the clearest refutation of the Berliner Gambit. It appears that former World Correspondence Champion Dr. Hans Berliner missed not one, not two but three (!!) different winning strategies for White on just one move. The starting moves:

sloughterchess

Trial diagram

sloughterchess

Even in the main line of the Berliner Gambit

, he missed a simple win as well.