Budapest Gambit

It's okay for both sides... I am never in a situation to play it being as I am neither a d4 player nor a Nf6.
I won't say much more without some research.

Normally, in d4 openings, Black has a very cramped game. The pawn on e5 is very agressively posted and insures Black greater piece activity if the gambit is declined. There are gobs of information about this opening on Wikipedia. (The article is reliable)



I'd rather prefer the caro-kahn defence but I'll give this a shot.
This opening is probably not a walk in the park for you if you like the Caro-Kann. These positions are mainly for attacking players who get more active pieces as a result of their e5 break in one thrust.

The line given by BasicLvrCH8r is opening theory until whites 8th move, which in fact is a total blunder, there should be more '?'`s attached to this move! Every budapest player has got quick wins even games that have been exactly the line given by BasicLvrCH8r. Here another line which i love to see white play.
Here is another line budapest players should know i guess.


KillaBeez wrote: You left out a move in your first example. Be5 doesn't trap the Queen, but after Qg5 Qxg5 Bxg5 Bxb2, White will lose a rook.
Woops, thanks for pointing that out! I shouldnt be chatting and posting critical lines for the good of the people of chess.com only to confuse them.

I dont like gambits
Technically, this is not really a gambit as Black will get the pawn back in most variations. Most attempts to hold onto the pawn fall flat on their face positionally. With the Budapest, you get dynamic as well as static advantages for your investment.


The Budapest Gambit is a great weapon for counterattackers and immediately strikes back in the center. It is full of traps and is a strong tool to induce a serious structural weakness for White. Here are the most common played variations. What do you think?