Chess Openings for Beginner

Sort:
f4ucorsair

I am just getting into chess again, after a long time without playing. I read a few Jeremy Silman books, so my understanding of tactics is pretty sound, but I'm consistently handicapped by my lack of knowledge regarding openings. I enjoy an agressive game as much as the next guy, but I can also appreciate good positional play.

What I'm asking for is one or two openings for black and white (each) that aren't too advanced, and have a lot of literature about them so I can get a solid grip on them. In particular I have no idea what to do when faced with 1 d4 as black, so an opening for that would be very helpful.

I really appreciate your help with this, as I feel I can get up to at least 1400 with a decent repertoire of openings. Thanks!

kindaspongey

For someone seeking help with choosing openings, I usually bring up Openings for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro (2014).

http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2014/05/review-of-pete-tamburros-openings-for.html

I believe that it is possible to see a fair portion of the beginning of Tamburro's book by going to the Mongoose Press site.

By the way, offhand, I am unable to think of a Silman book that would be classified as about tactics. You might want to consider something like Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1949).

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf

nikramius

I looked at that Tamburro book and was considering picking it up for my Kindle, but it appears that the Kindle version has annotation problems with the moves?  Can anyone let me know if it has been fixed?

 

Otherwise, would you happen to have any other recommendations? 

f4ucorsair

I read 'How to reasess your chess' by silman (mostly about positional play) 'Complete Book of chess strategy' (despite the name, I found it to be pretty tactically helpful) and  'Amateur's mind' (still workin my way through that one). 

My main problem with most chess books is they assume too much of the reader, and as a lower level player, it's difficult to get to the point where I can understand what they are saying without resorting to children's books (which are meant for children, and not so great for an adult)

f4ucorsair

I looked at reviews for the Tamburro book, and they were pretty lukewarm. This one http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ASHEFBA/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=14Y5UDZ04BDFJ&coliid=I32IGY3ZTA3ZBN

looked pretty good, anyone read Mastering Chess Openings Vol 1 by Jon Watson?

I want to know it's good before dropping money on it

kindaspongey
f4ucorsair wrote:

I looked at reviews for the Tamburro book, and they were pretty lukewarm. This one http://www.amazon.com/dp/B00ASHEFBA/ref=wl_it_dp_o_pC_nS_ttl?_encoding=UTF8&colid=14Y5UDZ04BDFJ&coliid=I32IGY3ZTA3ZBN

looked pretty good, anyone read Mastering Chess Openings Vol 1 by Jon Watson?

I want to know it's good before dropping money on it

There doesn't seem to be any doubt that the Watson series is well respected, but that doesn't mean that it is necessarily well-suited for the needs of f4ucorsair. In a review of the 2007 second volume, IM John Donaldson wrote, "I can strongly recommend Mastering The Chess Openings: Volume 2 to all chess players from 1800 on up."

http://dev.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Mastering-the-Chess-Openings-Volume-2-p3570.htm

Perhaps it is also worth noting what Watson himself wrote (at a time when apparently only two volumes were contemplated): "As I began work on this book it became obvious that even in two large volumes it wouldn't be possible to cover every opening, nor even the most significant variations of every opening, and still achieve the insights that I hoped to convey."

I don't know what reviews f4ucorsair has been looking at, but I often think of the 2006 warning of GM John Nunn about reviewers who "clearly have strong preferences as to the type of book they prefer and are unable to put themselves in the shoes of readers who do not share their prejudices; the result is like criticizing a book on Gruenfeld on the grounds that the reviewer would have preferred a book on the King's Indian."

For a better idea of whether or not a book is well-suited for one's needs, I think it is a good idea, when possible, to check out an online sample. At the Gambit Publications site, it is possible to view a few of the pages from the discussion of the French Defence in the Watson series. As I have mentioned before, I believe that it is possible to see a fair portion of the beginning of Tamburro's book by going to the Mongoose Press site.

nikramius wrote:

I looked at that Tamburro book and was considering picking it up for my Kindle, but it appears that the Kindle version has annotation problems with the moves?  Can anyone let me know if it has been fixed?

Otherwise, would you happen to have any other recommendations?

It seemed to me that Tamburro had a pretty unique approach to helping beginners with openings. Consequently, my first suggestion to nikramius would be to accept whatever problems are associated with the book if it seems to be the right book to read. The only other thing that I can think of is to name some books on specific less-advanced openings:

1...d6: Move by Move by Cyrus Lakdawala (2011)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627090726/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen157.pdf

Bird's Opening: Move by Move by Cyrus Lakdawala (2015)

The Colle: Move by Move by Cyrus Lakdawala (2013)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627110453/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen169.pdf

The Four Knights: Move by Move by Cyrus Lakdawala (2012)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627104938/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen159.pdf

The King's Indian Attack: Move by Move by Neil McDonald (2014)

The Modern: Move by Move by Cyrus Lakdawala (2012)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627122119/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen166.pdf

The Nimzo-Larsen Attack: Move by Move by Cyrus Lakdawala (2013)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627052905/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen175.pdf

Play the London System by Cyrus Lakdawala (2010)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627100246/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen139.pdf

The Scandinavian: Move by Move by Cyrus Lakdawala (2013)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626232217/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen171.pdf

The Torre Attack: Move by Move by Richard Palliser (2012)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627105428/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen161.pdf

f4ucorsair wrote:

My main problem with most chess books is they assume too much of the reader, and as a lower level player, it's difficult to get to the point where I can understand what they are saying without resorting to children's books (which are meant for children, and not so great for an adult)

In 2001, Dan Heisman noted, "Just because a book contains lots of information that you don't know, it doesn't necessarily mean that it will be extremely helpful in making you better at this point in your chess development."

https://web.archive.org/web/20140626180930/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/heisman06.pdf

Here are some books that strike me as having a good chance at being helpful for beginners:

Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson (2012)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090402/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review874.pdf

Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf

The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev

https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/most-instructive-games-of-chess-ever-played/

Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1949)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf

Discovering Chess Openings by GM Johm Emms (2006)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf

Chess Endgames for Kids by Karsten Müller (2015)

https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/chess-endgames-for-kids/

A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf

By the way, I think that a book can be quite worthwhile for an adult even if it has a reference to "kids" in the title.

RussBell

You might want to peruse some of the books in this list....

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-equipment/good-chess-opening-books-for-beginners-and-beyond

In particular, regarding your interest in a book on meeting 1.d4, "Queen's Gambit Declined" by Matthew Sadler is instructive and highly regarded.

Also, John Watson's "Mastering The Chesss Openings" series is certainly outstanding. His discussions and explanations of the theory of the openings are very instructive.  Although understand that the series is essentially an openings reference or survey.

Finally, for a good introduction to, and grounding in opening fundamental principles, perhaps the best book is "Discovering Chess Openings" by John Emms.

OldIronSide

Over the past few years I have found some openings that are not too advance but for which there are some good books.  I play these openings because I feel I get more out of my study time if I minimize the amount of opening study and spend more on Tactics.

 

My recommendations for White are The Scotch Game, and The Bishop Opening.  For Black vs 1 e4 I recommend the Caro-Kann or  The French, vs 1d4 I recommend The Dutch. 

 

As for books I recommend the Starting Out books, like Starting Out the Scotch Game and the Chess Explained books, like Chess Explained The French.  Also books like The Most Instructive Games of Chess Every Played and Understanding Chess Move by Move can be a big help. 

For Tactics I recommend Tactics Time. 

nikramius

@RussBell and @OldIronSide, thanks a ton!  I'll particularly look up, and try to memorize, those openings that you mentioned specifically.

Chicken_Monster

Tamburro's book seems decent, but why doesn't it even touch on the Slav etc.?

ipcress12

anyone read Mastering Chess Openings Vol 1 by Jon Watson?

f4u: Watson's MCO (not the old MCO!) is excellent, but judging by your live rating I suspect it's over your head for now.

I recommend looking through wiki entries on the openings to get an idea of what's out there and what you might like.

Don't sweat the openings. Your opponents won't be much better booked. You can get by on the standard advice -- occupy the center, develop your pieces, castle early etc.

You wil be surprised at how much you have to improve before your games aren't decided by dropping pieces and pawns or missing mating threats.

If you would feel more comfortable with a manageable opening repertoire, OldIronside's recommendations for the French or Caro-Kann for 1.e4 and the Dutch for 1.d4 are good. But going the double KP or QP routes are good too and some say better for long-range development of your abilities.

kindaspongey

"... it may be worth noting that flank openings such as the English, the Réti, the Nimzo-Larsen, and the Bird are not covered in either [of the first two volumes of the Mastering the Chess Openings series]. Also, the Scandinavian Defense is largely missing, as is the Queen’s Gambit Accepted, the Scotch, the Catalan, and the Dutch to mention only a few. ..." - FM Carsten Hansen (2007)

https://web.archive.org/web/20140627115737/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen99.pdf

X_PLAYER_J_X

I do not know if you are a 1.d4 player or not.

However, If you are I did write an article which might be helpful on a nice line which is recommended to beginners!

http://www.chess.com/blog/X_PLAYER_J_X/london-system

nikramius

@X_PLAYER_J_X, thanks a bajillion!  I'll look at that write up.  Very much appreciated!

X_PLAYER_J_X
nikramius wrote:

@X_PLAYER_J_X, thanks a bajillion!  I'll look at that write up.  Very much appreciated!

Yeah I like the London System myself.

I wasn't sure if you was the guy who said you liked the Scotch Opening or not.

However, I will add the link incase you was.

I wrote an article on it as well.

http://www.chess.com/blog/X_PLAYER_J_X/scotch-opening