Publishing a new opening

Sort:
Avatar of TeraHammer

Fools and thralls

write their names

on doors and walls

Avatar of schlechter55

2....d5 and black has a decisive advantage

Avatar of TeraHammer
schlechter55 wrote:

2....d5 and black has a decisive advantage

Please support this with a sample continuation to back up that statement, I'm quite interested on what grounds you claim that

Avatar of macer75

another Daeth?

Avatar of schlechter55

1. h4 e5, 2.g4 d5, 3.g5 h6, 4.d3 hxg5, 5.Bxg5 Be7, 6.Bxe7 Qxe7 .

Or 4.gxh6 Rxh6.

In both cases

1. Black better development

2. White has a weak pawn on h4

3. white has weak squares g4, h5 on the kingside.

Two weak points in the enemies position are enough to win a game.

Avatar of Irontiger

Sorry, it's already registered under A00 - Grosspatzer attack.

You can't claim it.

Avatar of royalbishop

The Spirit of Daeth lives on!

Avatar of schlechter55

The Grob opening is much better, but even that is better for Black.

1.g4 d5, 2.Bg2 , not loosing a tempo for the useless h4

2....Bxg4, 3.c4 c6, 4.cxd5 cxd5, 5.Qb3 Nf6, 6.Nc3 e6.

White can win back the pawn with 7.Qxb7 Nbd7, but he stays with square weaknesses on the kingside, and black has better development.

Avatar of royalbishop
Irontiger wrote:

Sorry, it's already registered under A00 - Grosspatzer attack.

You can't claim it.

Actually it looks like a famous attack but premature and move order wrong.

Avatar of schlechter55

Grosspatzer is not a real name. It means in german,

GREAT LOOSER

The german verb

patzen

means to make a huge obvious mistake.

Avatar of royalbishop

Good stuff.

Avatar of royalbishop

Hey i do not want to be left out on this new movement so also will start working on a new opening. And not to be outdone i will work on 2 new openings!

Avatar of TheKonigsbergKid

When in the process of writing a Ph.D dissertation, the candidate (commonly referred to as a Ph.Dc) must prove that their work provides an original contribution to the body of knowledge (e.g. science.)

Please do not interpret my question as being facetious or obnoxious Sir, I am merely ignorant. I know this is not a dissertation... but can you explain how this new opening provides an original contribution to chess theory?

-Stanley

Avatar of schlechter55

A few mouseclicks convince everybody that

1. the opening is not new

2. it is not good at all.

Look for instance on

chessok.com,

opening tree mode. There you will find games, and engine evaluations of the sequence 1.g4 e5, 2.h4.

Avatar of Irontiger
robertkop wrote:

Openings like this have a phisical adventage,                                                            If this opening is played against you with black,                                       You would be suprised and you would tough that you must win this because your opponent begins bad, but you don't know good what to do now.                                                                         There are too other openings like this like the Anderssen opening or the crab atttack.


Yeah, yeah, the 'psychological advantadge'.

I can assure you that although I do believe I have to win against this, I still play the moves needed and know when to take the draw. So much for the advantadges of that opening.

Now, the drawbacks... Hum... Go and see with schlechter, he is the only one here to take it seriously (apart from you).

Avatar of TheKonigsbergKid

@robert kop,

would you like to test this opening out against me in a friendly correspondence match? :P

Avatar of royalbishop

Publishing a new opening

:

The Robo Kobo Openings sounds nice.

Avatar of Jion_Wansu

My German opening is really popular...