2....d5 and black has a decisive advantage
Publishing a new opening
2....d5 and black has a decisive advantage
Please support this with a sample continuation to back up that statement, I'm quite interested on what grounds you claim that
1. h4 e5, 2.g4 d5, 3.g5 h6, 4.d3 hxg5, 5.Bxg5 Be7, 6.Bxe7 Qxe7 .
Or 4.gxh6 Rxh6.
In both cases
1. Black better development
2. White has a weak pawn on h4
3. white has weak squares g4, h5 on the kingside.
Two weak points in the enemies position are enough to win a game.
The Grob opening is much better, but even that is better for Black.
1.g4 d5, 2.Bg2 , not loosing a tempo for the useless h4
2....Bxg4, 3.c4 c6, 4.cxd5 cxd5, 5.Qb3 Nf6, 6.Nc3 e6.
White can win back the pawn with 7.Qxb7 Nbd7, but he stays with square weaknesses on the kingside, and black has better development.
Sorry, it's already registered under A00 - Grosspatzer attack.
You can't claim it.
Actually it looks like a famous attack but premature and move order wrong.
Grosspatzer is not a real name. It means in german,
GREAT LOOSER
The german verb
patzen
means to make a huge obvious mistake.
Hey i do not want to be left out on this new movement so also will start working on a new opening. And not to be outdone i will work on 2 new openings!
When in the process of writing a Ph.D dissertation, the candidate (commonly referred to as a Ph.Dc) must prove that their work provides an original contribution to the body of knowledge (e.g. science.)
Please do not interpret my question as being facetious or obnoxious Sir, I am merely ignorant. I know this is not a dissertation... but can you explain how this new opening provides an original contribution to chess theory?
-Stanley
A few mouseclicks convince everybody that
1. the opening is not new
2. it is not good at all.
Look for instance on
chessok.com,
opening tree mode. There you will find games, and engine evaluations of the sequence 1.g4 e5, 2.h4.
Openings like this have a phisical adventage, If this opening is played against you with black, You would be suprised and you would tough that you must win this because your opponent begins bad, but you don't know good what to do now. There are too other openings like this like the Anderssen opening or the crab atttack.
Yeah, yeah, the 'psychological advantadge'.
I can assure you that although I do believe I have to win against this, I still play the moves needed and know when to take the draw. So much for the advantadges of that opening.
Now, the drawbacks... Hum... Go and see with schlechter, he is the only one here to take it seriously (apart from you).
Fools and thralls
write their names
on doors and walls