MaxtonJHo wrote:
lassus_dinnao wrote:
CaroKannEnjoyer02 написал:
Sicilian defense, Smith Morra gambit; Questionable Bishop Sacrifice
the sacrifice is good. If the opponent accepts it white is like +1
I wanna try it
Ok then
Come up with a (serious) gambit!
Sort:
King's Pawn Opening: Wayward Queen Attack: Front Gambit
The idea is to move knight to f3 after, and then the position is nearly equal.
Black has the control of the center, and white has a pawn, so don't accept the gambit, there's a much better move which can make white have the advantage.
Dec 3, 2023
0
#125
Random_3M0 написал:
King's Pawn Opening: Wayward Queen Attack: Front Gambit
The idea is to move knight to f3 after, and then the position is nearly equal.
Black has the control of the center, and white has a pawn, so don't accept the gambit, there's a much better move which can make white have the advantage.
if the opponent just plays Bc4 you have to respond with g6, and now you have a misplaced bishop. Why go for a "nearly equal" position if you can destroy your opponent with classic anti-scholars mate defence?
SMACK BACK attACK
Smack, wack, and attack a lacking back tack on a yak's back rack attack
Dec 5, 2023
0
#130
The varuna17 hypergambit :1.f4 g5 2.fxg5 Bg7 3.Nf3 f6 then there are many lines...
Dutch defense: wing gambit
Nvm thats krejcik
CaroKannEnjoyer02 wrote:
Dutch defense: wing gambit
very similar to the tate gambit
Dec 6, 2023
0
#137
Philidor Defense: Spinach Gambit
(kitchener folly with colors reversed basically)
lassus_dinnao wrote:
if the opponent just plays Bc4 you have to respond with g6, and now you have a misplaced bishop. Why go for a "nearly equal" position if you can destroy your opponent with classic anti-scholars mate defence?
Well, as you can see, scholars mate only works for like players who have 400 elo or below, and for 500 ~ 1000 they would just take the free pawn.
This isn't a 100% serious gambit, because it only happens in like 500~1200 elo, and black has like 0.1 advantage.
So you can choose not to play it.
Idk Gambit!
Black gambits a pawn to release both their bishops and prepares to get a lead in development.
Knight's Gambit
The king now cant castle and is in the open while also opening a diagonal for future checks, and it also cost just a single knight, because the king takes the knight the d4 pawn can be defended on the next move.
If the king doesnt take and moves the queen, you win a rook anyway even though the gambit is declined
Or if they are -1000 elo and goes "ooga booga i take d4 pawn" take their queen, show them no mercy.(jk)
I have made up another opening before but this is no doubt 90% way better, if they take the knight they can't castle anymore, if they don't take then they look dumb because this is also a fork
Also according to google the earliest castle is 4 moves
Which erases 1 goal of the gambit that is to make your opponent unable to castle
But again, who would play like the black side?:
And still after that you are up 6 points of material
Sicilian defense, Smith Morra gambit; Questionable Bishop Sacrifice
the sacrifice is good. If the opponent accepts it white is like +1
I wanna try it