Considering the Budapest

Sort:
Avatar of SmyslovFan

Missjessica, look at the last post on the last page where I show the first moves.

Avatar of TheGreatOogieBoogie
missjessica77 wrote:
TheGreatOogieBoogie wrote:

 

 



 

Analysis by Stockfish 6 64:

 

 

+/=  (0.41)    Depth: 40/51   00:28:06  12617MN

How is this a Budapest Gambit position?



Avatar of Bishop_g5

@ SmyslovFan

Actually I find both openings very playable. You see...my level of competition it's to low where I can play every crap you can imagine. So, as Garry said...no big deal.

P.S : The game I posted is different from yours and with total other meaning! I am referring to a specific line not to the defense general dynamic. Please focus!

Avatar of Rumo75
Bishop_g5 hat geschrieben:
pfren wrote:

My personal belief is that 9...Re8 and the subsequent mutual pseudo-sacrifices of the exchange are by now predictable, rather dull... and mandatory. I would really love seeing 9...Nbd7 to work, but I have lost faith in it.

 Then maybe you should try 9...Na6. The Mikenas maneuver works pretty fine in this line combined with the later b6.