Defences to the Parham Attack


  • 4 years ago · Quote · #581

    Scottrf

    I am but a noob.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #582

    CHCL

    joeydvivre wrote:

    Yeah 4. Nxe4 is instant equality.  5 ...Be7 is instant equality and none of the sharp stuff in this opening (This is Frankenstein-Dracula mainline).  I am currently on the white side of a FD in a Vote Chess game that we are losing.  Bummer.

     I didn't realize that it was the Frankenstein-Dracula. Wow.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #583

    The_Gavinator

    jetfighter13 wrote:

    maybe they are in looneyville Gavinator. the problem with this logic is that in Matrix chess Rooks are also worth two and this is completely false. the reason is it takes two bishop's assisted to mate where as it takes only one rook assisted to mate.

     

    It does?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #584

    gambiteer12

    You know that JF meant a lone bishop cannot FORCE mate, while a rook is sufficient. 

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #585

    The_Gavinator

    "it takes two bishop's assisted to mate"

    Jetfighter is just freakin dumb. I think he might be the same person as Christiansoldier.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #586

    The_Gavinator

    Yes I know that, what does that have to do with anything? Stop trolling me bro

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #587

    gambiteer12

    You really struggle to remain rational don't you Gavin? I'm amazed we're trying to have discussion with some kid that calls himself the gavinator obsessed with a Gadaffi look alike who reckons vectors have a use in chess. Enlighten us how does black force mate below?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #588

    The_Gavinator

    No I showed what he said, jetfighter is just stupid.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #589

    The_Gavinator

    They can't, how dumb are you.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #590

    gambiteer12

    The_Gavinator wrote:

    They can't, how dumb are you.

    If they can't wtf is wrong with jetfighers statement. 

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #591

    The_Gavinator

    jetfighter13 wrote:

    maybe they are in looneyville Gavinator. the problem with this logic is that in Matrix chess Rooks are also worth two and this is completely false. the reason is it takes two bishop's assisted to mate where as it takes only one rook assisted to mate.

    No it doesn't.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #592

    The_Gavinator

    I know, but 1 bishop can give mate too.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #593

    gambiteer12

    You fail to understand the game of chess is not a cooperative affair. The mate you showed earlier cannot be forced. Therefore, jetfighters statement that two bishops in cooperation with a king are needed to force mate is completely valid.  

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #594

    The_Gavinator

    He never said force now did he?

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #595

    jetfighter13

    The_Gavinator wrote:
    jetfighter13 wrote:

    maybe they are in looneyville Gavinator. the problem with this logic is that in Matrix chess Rooks are also worth two and this is completely false. the reason is it takes two bishop's assisted to mate where as it takes only one rook assisted to mate.

     

     

    It does?

    no the situation that I refered to was below

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #596

    The_Gavinator

    You never mentioned the word force, and there is no mate there period. Stop trolling.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #597

    jetfighter13

    Ok you are the one trolling because you don't know general chess termonology. when I say a Bishop and King cannot mate without extra help I mean against a lone king where as a rook can do that with a king. its simple endgame termonology that you don't know because you never get there. either because you loose. win because of your elaborate trap. or just plain don't care to play one.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #598

    nameno1had

    I wish I had admin control. I'd retitle this thread, "Gavinator is a troll" making sure that is by Gavinator, giving his apology along with a lengthy, why the Parham is inept. Then I'd lock it.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #599

    browni3141

    I don't think the value of pieces has much to do with how easy it is to mate the king with them.

  • 4 years ago · Quote · #600

    jetfighter13

    well calling a rook equal to a bishop is looney. therefore Gavinator Parham and anyone who agree's with them are loons. Dive back underwater why doncha


Back to Top

Post your reply: