sengdao wrote:
Here_Is_Plenty wrote:
I think the thread-starter is just starting as many threads as he can.
I'm not
So, what are you doing??
Does Chess make your math slower?
Sort:
Charlie_Croker wrote:
SchuBomb wrote:
sengdao wrote:
If no give me 2 reasons.
1. You're a knob.
2. You sucking at maths doesn't prove anything.
...at last, someone who can spell maths correctly
math in American English=maths in British English
I also must suck at maths, because many of my co-workers call me the dumb-maths guy...
SchuBomb wrote:
sengdao wrote:
If no give me 2 reasons.
1. You're a knob.
2. You sucking at maths doesn't prove anything.
Cruel, but it cracked me up.
How bout chess maths?
Kramnik shutout Kasparov who has an enormous plus against Anand, therefore Kramnik would easily destroy...no that maths doesn't work.
I like the humour here.
If anything chess is good for math? I read that they share a lot in common, problem solving being one of them, common sense and good logic alone would tell you this.
Come to think of it. Could someone provide me with another proof for Fermat's last theorem? It seems a risky venture to rely on one alone.
oinquarki wrote:
tigergutt wrote:
isnt the burden of proof on the one with the claim?
No, the burden of proof lies on whoever disagrees with me.
whomever
madhatter5 wrote: whomever
Prove it.
This thread probably contains the most scientific nonsense anyone has ever wrote about unicorns.
Anyhow, to get this thread on topic - since it's posted in chess openings - I do believe we should now make up an opening line that we could call the Unicorn Attack or something along those lines.
efour wrote:
This thread probably contains the most scientific nonsense anyone has ever wrote about unicorns.
Anyhow, to get this thread on topic - since it's posted in chess openings - I do believe we should now make up an opening line that we could call the Unicorn Attack or something along those lines.
http://www.chess.com/opening/eco/B00_Owen_Defense_Unicorn_Variation
oinquarki wrote:
efour wrote:
This thread probably contains the most scientific nonsense anyone has ever wrote about unicorns.
Anyhow, to get this thread on topic - since it's posted in chess openings - I do believe we should now make up an opening line that we could call the Unicorn Attack or something along those lines.
http://www.chess.com/opening/eco/B00_Owen_Defense_Unicorn_Variation
So much for being clever. I guess you learn something every day.
Please Sign Up to comment.
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
If no give me 2 reasons.
1. You're a knob.
2. You sucking at maths doesn't prove anything.
...at last, someone who can spell maths correctly