does the Scandinavian actually work??

Sort:
Cobra2721
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Scandinavian isn’t very good. Doesn’t make much sense to voluntarily bring out your queen just so you can get attacked. Playable, and it’s not unsound, but… meh I personally don’t like it

UR 1700 buddy

pleewo

And? 
Also my blitz and bullet are both 200 points higher than yours so get rekt L bozo 🪑

Cobra2721
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

And? 
Also my blitz and bullet are both 200 points higher than yours so get rekt L bozo 🪑

my guy thinks blitz and bullet openings matter... and that blitz and bullet matter in general.... and that I try in blitz and bullet

Cobra2721

homeboy check out my rated blitz games

pleewo

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

Cobra2721
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

pleewo
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

And? 
Also my blitz and bullet are both 200 points higher than yours so get rekt L bozo 🪑

my guy thinks blitz and bullet openings matter... and that blitz and bullet matter in general.... and that I try in blitz and bullet

Hah! Embarrassed that a lowly frog is far higher rated than you in blitz and bullet. Excuses I see.
And do you think I try?

pleewo
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

pleewo


Yes, you are. And Magnus is 2900

Cobra2721
FrogboyWarpz wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

peak 1981 underated

Cobra2721
FrogboyWarpz wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

And? 
Also my blitz and bullet are both 200 points higher than yours so get rekt L bozo 🪑

my guy thinks blitz and bullet openings matter... and that blitz and bullet matter in general.... and that I try in blitz and bullet

Hah! Embarrassed that a lowly frog is far higher rated than you in blitz and bullet. Excuses I see.
And do you think I try?

idk whether u try or not is irrelevant, I dont try buddy

Cobra2721
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Yes, you are. And Magnus is 2900

and?????

pleewo
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

peak 1981 underated

ok.

Also ahem ahem not to brag but my peak in blitz is 1700 and my peak in rapid is 1800 ahem ahem

pleewo
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Yes, you are. And Magnus is 2900

and?????

💀 🪑 😭

Cobra2721
FrogboyWarpz wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:
cogadhtintreach wrote:
FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

peak 1981 underated

ok.

Also ahem ahem not to brag but my peak in blitz is 1700 and my peak in rapid is 1800 ahem ahem

ok???

MarioParty4

This turned into an argument about ratings, letters, and chairs.

Refrigerator321
MarioParty4 wrote:

This turned into an argument about ratings, letters, and chairs.

Chairs??

YasminSingh09

Thanks

beaverchess45
At least someone actually ended that argument. Thank goodness!
beaverchess45
Now can someone post some examples of the Scandinavian?