does the Scandinavian actually work?? - Chess Forums - Page 3

beaverchess45 · 2023-05-28T11:55:16-07:00

I’ve been doing a little observing, and I realized when opponents play the Scandinavian I usually rip open their defenses really quickly, and they bring out the queen too early. These are not very good tactics, and it just makes me wonder whether the Scandinavian is even a good defense. It’s not rea

Cobra2721

Jun 18, 2023

0

#41

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Scandinavian isn’t very good. Doesn’t make much sense to voluntarily bring out your queen just so you can get attacked. Playable, and it’s not unsound, but… meh I personally don’t like it

UR 1700 buddy

pleewo

Jun 18, 2023

0

#42

And?
Also my blitz and bullet are both 200 points higher than yours so get rekt L bozo 🪑

Cobra2721

Jun 18, 2023

0

#43

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

And?
Also my blitz and bullet are both 200 points higher than yours so get rekt L bozo 🪑

my guy thinks blitz and bullet openings matter... and that blitz and bullet matter in general.... and that I try in blitz and bullet

Cobra2721

Jun 18, 2023

0

#44

homeboy check out my rated blitz games

pleewo

Jun 18, 2023

0

#45

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

Cobra2721

Jun 18, 2023

0

#46

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

pleewo

Jun 18, 2023

0

#47

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

And?
Also my blitz and bullet are both 200 points higher than yours so get rekt L bozo 🪑

my guy thinks blitz and bullet openings matter... and that blitz and bullet matter in general.... and that I try in blitz and bullet

Hah! Embarrassed that a lowly frog is far higher rated than you in blitz and bullet. Excuses I see.
And do you think I try?

pleewo

Jun 18, 2023

0

#48

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

pleewo

Jun 18, 2023

0

#49

Yes, you are. And Magnus is 2900

Cobra2721

Jun 18, 2023

0

#50

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

peak 1981 underated

Cobra2721

Jun 18, 2023

0

#51

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

And?
Also my blitz and bullet are both 200 points higher than yours so get rekt L bozo 🪑

my guy thinks blitz and bullet openings matter... and that blitz and bullet matter in general.... and that I try in blitz and bullet

Hah! Embarrassed that a lowly frog is far higher rated than you in blitz and bullet. Excuses I see.
And do you think I try?

idk whether u try or not is irrelevant, I dont try buddy

Cobra2721

Jun 18, 2023

0

#52

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Yes, you are. And Magnus is 2900

and?????

pleewo

Jun 18, 2023

0

#53

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

peak 1981 underated

ok.

Also ahem ahem not to brag but my peak in blitz is 1700 and my peak in rapid is 1800 ahem ahem

pleewo

Jun 18, 2023

0

#54

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Yes, you are. And Magnus is 2900

and?????

💀 🪑 😭

Cobra2721

Jun 18, 2023

0

#55

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

cogadhtintreach wrote:

FrogboyWarpz wrote:

Just because I’m 1700 it means I’m not allowed to have an opinion or make a statement?

You think you’re the high rated kid in the park? I can’t wait for a 2100 to come and scoff at your lowly 1900 rapid.

“HAH! What a puny sub-2000 rated player. Terrible at chess. I can’t believe they have the audacity to actually say something on a forum! Only I am allowed to say stuff because I’m the superior”

IM 2000

peak 1981 underated

ok.

Also ahem ahem not to brag but my peak in blitz is 1700 and my peak in rapid is 1800 ahem ahem

ok???

MarioParty4

Jun 18, 2023

0

#56

This turned into an argument about ratings, letters, and chairs.

Refrigerator321

Jun 18, 2023

0

#57

MarioParty4 wrote:

This turned into an argument about ratings, letters, and chairs.

Chairs??

YasminSingh09

Jun 19, 2023

0

#58

Thanks

beaverchess45

Jun 20, 2023

0

#59

At least someone actually ended that argument. Thank goodness!

beaverchess45

Jun 20, 2023

0

#60

Now can someone post some examples of the Scandinavian?