The things I am talking about here are nothing new and will definitely be useful for people who keep failing at keeping an opening advantage. There is a system which enables White to maintain initiative, but not quite finished yet. There are still some questions to be answered. Keep in mind that being open minded is a good thing. As for books...of course they will say something like "Winning with the Scotch" for example. That doesn't mean it is true. It will get more attention that way.
Again just a reminder! If you don't find my advices useful than, maybe someone else will. You have expressed your negativity and disbelief towards the idea I proposed and that's fine, but telling me I have no idea what I am talking about since you don't understand or don't want to understand is just wrong.
Thank you ChessGeekYT.
AncientGM please stop as you have NO IDEA what you're talking about.
Look at ANY databases or read ANY chess theory book, they all say the exact opposite to what you're saying. If Kasparov plays 1. b4 and wins what the hell are you talking about? Have you ever even looked at a database in your life?
There are lots of strong and interesting players around here with a lot of chess knowledge but I don't understand why people like you feel the need to spread misinformation without having any idea what you're talking about.
The site has so many people like that. It's the reason why I quit the forum for years. Can you really believe you have any idea what you're talking about? Just stop.