e4 or something else ?

Sort:
RatingCounts

X_PLAYER_J_X, please do not use a computer for your analysis. Use your own brains.

X_PLAYER_J_X
RatingCounts wrote:

X_PLAYER_J_X, please do not use a computer for your analysis. Use your own brains.

With all due respect RatingCounts, but you can not tell me what to use!

I am a student of chess and I will use all resources at my disposal to improve.

Which will include and not limited to:

Computer analysis, Computer engines, Chess databases, Peer Idea's, My own Idea's, Past chess Idea's, Hierarchies, and Forum posts.

Azeem40
RatingCounts wrote:

X_PLAYER_J_X, please do not use a computer for your analysis. Use your own brains.

What's wrong with using a computer for analysis?

Diakonia
Azeem40 wrote:
RatingCounts wrote:

X_PLAYER_J_X, please do not use a computer for your analysis. Use your own brains.

What's wrong with using a computer for analysis?

Absolutely nothing, as long as you understand the analysis, and not just recite "White is better by .4 of a pawn"

Azeem40

Lol, true.

X_PLAYER_J_X

Well if he wanted me to add commentary than I would have.

However, telling me not to use computer analysis seems a little extreme.

It is a very powerful tool.



RatingCounts

Look man, I am not asking you to not use computers, it is just that thinking on your own develops your thinking and makes you realise your mistakes.