e6 vs d6 Sicilian

Sort:
EvidentRoad

The thing with the d6 sicilian is it is so hard to break down. why play e6 when d6 is so hard to refute. I am switching to d4 as my main just to avoid the d6 sicilian

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:

The thing with the d6 sicilian is it is so hard to break down. why play e6 when d6 is so hard to refute. I am switching to d4 as my main just to avoid the d6 sicilian

This conversation came about’s because a majority of my play were e6 structures.

I play the Najdorf and Dragon because that’s what was taught to me against the open Sicilian but winning was the reasons why I continued with it.

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:

The thing with the d6 sicilian is it is so hard to break down. why play e6 when d6 is so hard to refute. I am switching to d4 as my main just to avoid the d6 sicilian

Have considered the English or Reti?

EvidentRoad

Yeah not my play style. I will honestly prolly stick with e4 but i am learning d4 so if i know someone plays the d6 sicilian i can avoid it.

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:

Yeah not my play style. I will honestly prolly stick with e4 but i am learning d4 so if i know someone plays the d6 sicilian i can avoid it.

That’s is awesome and funny at the same time that you are putting in so much effort because of the d6 Sicilian.

EvidentRoad

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

EvidentRoad

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

The CK is stubborn.

Have you tried accelerating to the Panov Attack? I do this the odd time transposed from 1. c4.

My main lines against the CK are the Katalimov as white where I keep the pawn tension and break open the d file. I do the same against the Alapin and white does not get his two center pawns.

The other line is by the Reti in getting c4 to open up the Catalan Bishop.

 

EvidentRoad

Panov is gross. I like the fantasy tbh but it is not good enough at this level

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

That is a wide margin.

What are you playing against the Sicilian?

EvidentRoad
Chuck639 wrote:
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

That is a wide margin.

What are you playing against the Sicilian?

English attack set up vs all of it besides the classical. the classical i play the Rauzer. I think i play the set ups wrong but idk

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

You should segment the data to rapid.

Bullet and blitz would skew the significance of the data.

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

That is a wide margin.

What are you playing against the Sicilian?

English attack set up vs all of it besides the classical. the classical i play the Rauzer. I think i play the set ups wrong but idk

May be do some home work and stay consistent with your replies.

There are plenty of resources on those where white is favorable.

EvidentRoad

i mostly play blitz. I like never play Rapid except for NSPCL

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

That is a wide margin.

What are you playing against the Sicilian?

English attack set up vs all of it besides the classical. the classical i play the Rauzer. I think i play the set ups wrong but idk

Lastly, you can consider 2. c4 and transpose to the Botvinnik System to kill the excitement then and there.

EvidentRoad

This is the rapid

EvidentRoad
Chuck639 wrote:
chessknight222 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

That is a wide margin.

What are you playing against the Sicilian?

English attack set up vs all of it besides the classical. the classical i play the Rauzer. I think i play the set ups wrong but idk

Lastly, you can consider 2. c4 and transpose to the Botvinnik System to kill the excitement then and there.

If i am going to switch openings i am gonna to play d4. I already bought Sam SHanklands course on it.

EvidentRoad

These are the openings i play. I know them well but still struggle.

Chuck639
chessknight222 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
chessknight222 wrote:
Chuck639 wrote:
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

That is a wide margin.

What are you playing against the Sicilian?

English attack set up vs all of it besides the classical. the classical i play the Rauzer. I think i play the set ups wrong but idk

Lastly, you can consider 2. c4 and transpose to the Botvinnik System to kill the excitement then and there.

If i am going to switch openings i am gonna to play d4. I already bought Sam SHanklands course on it.

He’s pretty good.

Ethan_Brollier
chessknight222 wrote:

Also the Caro Kann tbh. if i can avoid that i would be happy.

See what i  mean? My win rate is great or decent against everything besides c6 and c5. and in c5 i have a winning record vs all the lines not d6

There's a tricky sideline against 1... c6. The Breyer Variation is a gambit, but it is a somewhat solid gambit, as at the very worst, you will have two pieces developed, an open center, the ability to castle, and the ability to take back the lost pawn, while your opponent will have only one piece developed to a sub-optimal square. At best, you can have a +3, +7.5, or M6 advantage by move 7.


Another good sideline against 1... c6 is the Advanced Panov Attack, Toikkanen Gambit, which engine evaluates as almost perfectly even, but most players won't know (or want to even play, if they do know) any of the best moves to get to this even position, so it'll take them out of their comfort zone in both theory and playstyle.

1. e4 c6 2. c4 d5 3. e5 dxc4 4. Bxc4 Qd4 5. Qe2 6. Bg4 f3 7. Bf5 g4 8. Bg6 e6 7. fxe6 Qxe6