12926 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I'd play the Sicilian if I were facing someone rated 500 points above me, especially in a blitz or rapid game, just as I would the Grünfeld or any other sharp line that I knew. I'd far rather lose 96 times out of 100 in a complicated, interesting game and win the odd one where he misses something than be ground down 85 times out of 100 and occasionally manage a draw in a game where I have no chances to win.
#6621 I've played that trap so many times, mostly in the Caro-Kann 4...Nd7 lines: 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 dxe4 4.Nxe4 Nd7 5.Nf3 Nf6 6.Nxf6+ Nxf6 7.Bc4 Bg4?? and then the strongest move is 8.Bxf7+! Kxf7 9.Ne5+, but 8.Ne5 is more spectacular. 8...Be6 and White has an advantage due to the doubled e-pawns, but I'd far rather be a pawn up.
"There is no generally accepted definition of a miniature. I challenge you to find one, you won't be able to."
Actually there is. Several authors have already said so. Bill Wall for example, in several of his books says that in his introduction.
When I talk to other chess people, in person, most of them members of the USCF, not one of them have ever said 30 moves was a miniature. And 25.5 is still not 25.
You only need to Google it to find the multitude of different answers and non-answers to this question.
Do you really have nothing better to do than post "Sorry, too long" on this thread every time someone posts a 26 move game?
One of my favourite chess books at home is Barden and Heidenfeld, Modern Chess Miniatures, 1960. They hew to the 25-move definition but give one or two games where White wins on move 26. The games can be found here and there are some tremendous ones.
Another has the same title but is by Neil McDonald and was published in 1995. He uses a 30-move definition IIRC (I've read it much less than B&H's).
Not that I'm going to insist that either Barden and Heidenfeld's opinion, or McDonald's, should carry any greater weight than yours, but you might engage a little humility on your own account.
This game, from Barden and Heidenfeld, runs 33 moves, but the book gives it to move 25W, after which there's a perpetual check that the players carried on with for a few moves. It's a fun game though (and rather more wide-open than Nimzovitch's Defence normally gets).
I bought Barden and Heidenfeld last year. The games are of outstanding quality--usually the critical blunder seems logical and natural, but there is some reason that it fails.
Thank you for this post. Lots of new licks to learn! Chess Licks!
I'm proud of myself for spotting an error in the analysis of one game though - towards the end of the Pirc Defence Balogh vs Sandor. Overall the lines they explore are extremely entertaining and instructive though. I absolutely love the Orang-Utan game between Sokolsky and Strugatch!
My coach didn't want me to change to the Vienna instead of the Lopez, but I have decades of experience with it, and in my 4 years with the Lopez, I never got to play anything quite like this, Morphy-esque if I say so myself (well if not for his blunder on his last move, perhaps it wouldn't have turned out a miniature)
This was played on other site casual chess. I don't understand low rated players with all that h6 a6 with black and moving same piece multiple times without any plan.. don't they know they are supposed to castle and develop pieces...?
You can't play like that even on 3 min blitz.. you will be always low rated and losing a lot. You might say you are playing for fun, but where is the fun when you lose a lot? If you like that then why did not wanted rematch to lose few more games...
Loved both games AIM but don't you think your first comment on #6619 is a bit condescending? At the very least you ignore that some people just want a fun game when they play.
by incorrectname 4 minutes ago
Am I a fool for not playing 1. e4
by Rumo75 5 minutes ago
Need a helping hand
by DonaldoTrump 7 minutes ago
"Friendly" mode in Fritz15
by GiampaoloTalamo 8 minutes ago
7/27/2016 - Dual Threats
by slaverobbie 9 minutes ago
I am millionaire, how can I improve at chess?
by DonaldoTrump 9 minutes ago
White to move, mate in two. I CAN'T SOLVE IT!!!!! HELP!!!!
by xerxes149 11 minutes ago
The solskytz opening and jengaias openings
by incorrectname 14 minutes ago
Tournament Format Question
by Martin_Stahl 17 minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 20 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!