There is so much rubbish on this thread.
The opening is just there to lead to a playable middlegame. The London system achieves that aim, No more, no less
Not so after Black commit an early e6 where White can use the light squares to achieve strategic goals that can give more than a playable middlegame. The thing is ....why to play the London if Black doesnt commit an early e6? Why to play the Colle Zukertor for the same reason? Why to play the Torre attack?
Whats Whites benefit from these openings with out an early e6 on the board? The playable middlegame?
....and those who want something more from the opening? Lets play 1.d4 Nf6 2.Bf4 and pray Black to follow with e6?
I hate to break it to you but if black plays properly there is no opening which wins for white. Whites aim should be to reach a middlegame in a position he feels comfortable in and knows how to play. And for many club players the London is fairly easy to play, and there is little risk of early disaster
The OP is a 1300 blitz player. The London System is an opening where it's hard to drop material, and it activates white's pieces in an OK way. I think that's more than enough.