END your 1.d4/London/closed game/positional woes forever with 1.d4 e5!? 2.dxe5 d6 3.exd6 Bxd6!

END your 1.d4/London/closed game/positional woes forever with 1.e4!

END your 1.d4/London/closed game/positional woes forever with ABORT THE GAME BUTTON

not so much fun...

indeed. It's not like he's aspiring for more than what he's currently playing at. I had a good chess buddy back in the day who played only c4/c5~English as White, Sicilian (2. ... Nc6 systems) & Benoni. He was always tough to play against, always very cool under fire. If you enjoy playing chess it shines through. Don't have to be a world beater to advocate a style that some may relate to.

sometimes

sometimes not

then sometimes again

I very much enjoy fighting on my terms and my way as black for once.

why are people still on this forum? this gambit is complete trash and easy to refute

END your 1.d4/London/closed game/positional woes forever with 1.e4

Be prepared for if they decline. I'm sure most won't tho

decining is how you win

1. d4 e5 2. dxe5 d6 3. Nf3 Nc6 4.Bg5

has NEVER HAPPENED in a game yet. otherwise I'm 44:56 with 3...Bg4 in 9 games and have won 4 out of 5 games with 3...Nc6. I should make learning to play 3...Nc6 a priority and do a bit of homework

4.Bf4 - won 2 out of 3 games

4.e4 won

4.exd6 won

so yes, this opening does punish WHITE's many mistakes, hard pressed to intuitively find the winning line.

i haven't beaten 2.c4 or 2.Nc3 yet

here's how you beat it:

I hate playing hide and seek with kings and pawns in the center and lose games for it, but not as spectacularly as this one I passed 2 opportunities to grab that rook because I was too busy stressing the center, and possibly the clock

why keep continuing to use trashy gambits that have clear refutations? these little tricks will only get you so far and if you truly want to get better then start playing something more sound. again these gambits are the reasnn why you will never get better and keep losing.

Yes, all that WINNING and finally ENJOYING games as black for the FIRST TIME EVER, is "holding me back". I should go back to the "respectable" stonewall, go back to losing 10% or more of my games, hate playing and toss my tactical tools out the window to appease your sad butt?

All my WINNING is in gambits, except the toothless scandinavian which i DESPISE, and even then, get crushed in closed and positional lines, and all of my losing is in positional and hypermodern.

It's too freakin' bad for YOU that attackers love gambits. As bad as you claim this gambit is, I just smoked an 1850 with it BECAUSE I need mobility. That's where my skills shine and you positional weenies aren't as smart as you THINK you are getting mated in under 20 without your safe little cocoon.

I'm going to keep playing MY WAY wherever my rating peaks. I hate long boring games, even if I win them. Chess is GLORIOUS BATTLE! I'll leave cowardly bean counting accounting to you.

I've searched for EXACTLY this opening 2 decades with the likes of you trying to gatekeep everyone else's repertoire. All your trash talk, but my CRUSHING STATS, with an "inferior" opening only makes each win MORE DELICIOUS.

I spit on your positional lawn, now that I've found hartlaub charlick, pawn pushing cowards gotta FIGHT ON MY TURF, and they just aren't up to it. They can't keep up with a ruthless CREATIVE attacker who disrupts their plans.

If I WASN'T crushing opponents, no matter WHAT they throw at me 2:1, you might have a point, but arguing against RESULTS makes you look intellectually challenged.

Out in the open is MY STYLE, deal with it troll. The only thing holding ME back is everything ELSE I play as black and that feeds my stress and frustration, keeping me "out of the zone", where I can think more clearly, and games come EASY, even at the 1800 level.

I get wood every time someone pushes 1.d4... yeah... you THOUGHT I was going to play passive and = so you can get that nice cushy pawn pushing coward endgame you wanted... not going to happen DEFEND YOURSELF OR DIE!

you're such a bawk-bawk-bawk, you're AFRAID of lines NOBODY PLAYS! just the possibility that someone COULD makes you wet your pants in terror.

In very many of my games in which I'm losing badly, most likely getting positionally smothered and unable to get mobile, once pawn pusher runs out of steam, I crush them with mobility when I FINALLY get to make an offensive move.

It ain't over til the fat klingon sings. I win by attacking. It's what I do, and I do it better than my peers. Even if I was good at positional, I still wouldn't play it because it's BORING BORING BORING!!!

you can still play agressively without having to play a dubious opening where white wins if he knows what hes doing. I play the leningrad dutch solely because it forces an imbalanced position where i have the chance to play a dynamic game.

again you will never be a good chess player if you refuse to learn principled chess. im going to assume that you dont care about that and just want to go for tricks and get that dopamine rush you get when you beat them with your little gambit.

you seriously should not be complaining about Scandinavian or closed players when you play these cheese little opening traps that gotham or some other youtuber taught you

lenningrad is a fianchetto system. i hate fianchettos. hartlaub charlick is the ONLY non-fianchetto attacking system. that's why it was love at first sight.

NOBODY taught me the CRUSHING mieses gambit! I stubled onto it by accident and just stuck with destroying carokanns.

I quit chess for over a decade over stankwall and skankanavian with no tools to create trees or train with them, and no-one suggesting hartlaub charlick which I begged and begged for, so when I got the urge to play chess again because i couldn't take online cheating river rat math in poker anymore, i just did tactics puzzles. no playing, just tactics because that's ALL I WANT TO DO.

get over your condescending tone their trollboy. you know NOTHING of any value

why do you sound like a politician writing a campaign speech tho

sorry, like a Trump social media post