alexlaw wrote:
no one seems to be serious analysing this opening i think.
That is strictly forbidden.
Envented a new opening-how do I get credit 4 it?
Sort:
It was meant more as borberline humor rather than "funny"and only as compared to all the space given to some very poor players who think some very poor opening they invented should be named after them.
Also ridiculous is how they post blitz games between them and some other non titled player as if it means anything. Oh, your opponent blundered a knight on move 22 and lost on time? What does that have to do with anything?
No fraid not!
you mean fred not?
ok, I do not have an opening named after me but I do have a move in an opening named after me:
The King takes on d7 move is perfectly OK. Probably would have played it too. The king is probably ok on e7 and white can't drum up an attack on that square all that quick.
bpjones, glad u got a laff out of it!
You didn't tell us the name of the move ! I hope it's not "The Lazy Knight". He's my brother. No kudos to him!
amazed we all have time to play with all the banter !!!!!!!!!
When you see 5600 attempts on a tactics puzzle and only 10 comments, you realize most players are completely banterless. You and I, however, are not among them.
Serious analysis:
Ponz, I caught on too, but I am sorry that it wasn't funny :-) You still rock though.
BTW, what opening is named after you? I am curious on this.