Exchange KID

Sort:
DiversifiedPortfolio

I have a general question about the exchange KID. I think the opening is relatively promising for people who enjoy playing endgames and trying to grind out slightly better positions. Why do most people who play the KID exchange play 6. Be2 instead of 6. h3? In the mainline it just looks like white gets the extra move h3, which can't be bad for white. 

The only explanation I can think of is that black has a lot of alternatives to 6...e5 against 6. h3 that all have their own venom, whereas against 6. Be2, moves other than 6...e5 are not so great. Or could it be that instead of 9...Re8, black can have an improved exchange KID with a move like 9...Nbd7, 9...Na6 or 9...c6 where the bishop would rather be on e2? Could someone please explain?
poucin

1 : Black can deviate once white played h3, he can choose Na6 first for example then e5. Na6 being the main variation in h3 systems.

2 : anyway, does h3 really helps white in exchange variation?

For instance, in this game :

This is the model game given by J.Gallagher in his Starting out KID. White can improve in this game (15.Nc4 was a mistake, 0-0-0 was better and led to slightly better endgame for black). Gallagher tells that h3 wouldnt really improve white's position and indeed, black didnt use g4 square.
 
And as u pointed out, possible that black can try to use a variation where there is not Bc4 move, so Na6 makes the job here (again, but i like this move very much in KID).
2 examples (playing in blitz but who black's play seems easy) :
c6 is also a possibility, but it can transpose into Na6 anyway, another example :
I think KID players are usually happy to see exchange variation. It is really more easy to handle than big lines!
Moreover, those playing it are usually players refusing the fight, they play passive and i am not sure it is a good idea against black's set up which after all, has a better pawn structure...
poucin

I didnt say it was a bad variation.

I said it is usually played by players who refuse the fight (because KI scares them), so they want to simplify and they play passive.

But sure, if the variation is played well, with energy, then i can be a very good weapon.

A bit similar than exchange french.

TwoMove

Ooh the terrifying b4 again. No in seriousness, will have to checkout what Koutronias recommends, because he chooses the 8...c6 pawn sac line, in his series on the KingsIndian.

(I was a bit confused meant 8RXQ RxR 9Bg5 c6 as in the Kozul game above. 80.0 c6 is a bit unusal, more typical is 8...Nc6 or probably the most natural 8...nb-d7 from this move order. Ding drew comfortably enough with 8...nc6 against Li Chao though. Probably there is nothing wrong with 8...c6, and Bacrot mistimed playing Nh5 intending nf4.)

TwoMove

In the game Li Chao v Ding 2015 white didn't acheive anything in 8...Nc6 9.Bg5 Qxd1 9RfxQ Bg4 line. This seems a straightforward way for black to equalise. Black can try to make the game more lively with 9...h6, using the two bishops after 10BxN BxB 11Nd5 Bd8. White usually tries 10Be3. If black plays 70.0 Nc6 will need to know how to play this delayed exchange version anyway.

tyler
[COMMENT DELETED]
TwoMove

The "KID Killer" Li Chao wasn't so effective in his match verus Grischuk, a KID specialist. For the exchange var to acheive anything think helps if rated a few hundred points higher than opponent, or playing someone like Bacrot, who plays everything, but not especially well for a FIDE 2700. Somehow we are missing a chess com article "When the KID wasn't killed" or similar, you know to give a balanced view.

Merovwig

@jengaias, you wrote in the Li Chao - Rombach game's diagram:

14.Nxc8 "A weird decision to exchange a knight that has moved 3 times for a bishop that hasn't move even once , yet it is a typical one."

But after 13...Re8, the Knight is trapped. And before that, after Black played 11...c6, it seems that White's Knight has only two kinds of alternatives:

- retreating

- or exchanging in f6, after what Black's position is not "cramped" anymore and Black can simply develop his Bishop on e6/g4 with an equal/dull position.

Regarding the following moves of this game, I'm not a titled player but the all point of this variation with Black's Knights in d7 and e6 at move 17, is to control c5 in order to exchange White's good Bishop against our bad dark-squared Bishop after bringing it there.

So, I 18...Ndf8?! looks a bit dubious to me (notice that White played c5 right away after that move) and 18...Bf8 was beyond doubt better (with the idea 19...Bc5, and Black seems fine carrying out his simple plan).

Just to say that as a KID player, the exchange variation gives me a calm game with simple plans (in comparison with the main lines) even against a slightly better opponent and, as underlined Poucin, h3 doesn't do much to change that.

Merovwig

Nobody said the exchange variation is loss-proof, just that it usually makes life easier for Black at equal level.

TwoMove

Opps I got the wrong player. In my mind thought he didn't think worth while testing Grischuk in the exchange. Oh well maybe will see how Grischuk deals with it some other time.