Fried Liver Attack

Sort:
Black_Itachi

Why is the Fried Liver Attack making a resurgence? Returned to the site after some time out and now like 70%+ of my white opponents play it

my137thaccount
Black_Itachi wrote:

Why is the Fried Liver Attack making a resurgence? Returned to the site after some time out and now like 70%+ of my white opponents play it

It's not the Fried Liver Attack. It's just called the 4.Ng5 Two Knights

my137thaccount
BDherin wrote:
I find this attack annoying I play e6 and it seems to work

Explain? The pawn on e5 can't move backward

respecthebish1

After bc4 the best reply is bc5. (d3 nf6 ng5 and u can castle and avoid any early attack)

my137thaccount
BDherin wrote:
Just got done playing hour of bullet chess to get above 1100.
As black I saw the fried liver attack to many times.
So now I have to learn how to play against such a dumb strategy.

How would you play the hyper dragon against the fried liver?

With respect, you seem quite confused about the opening. Instead of trying to learn specific information, you should focus on basic opening principles - control the centre, develop pieces, castle quickly (ideally kingside). Of course you're free to ignore, this is just a suggestion happy.png

Moro-gami

d5 5. exd5 (don't retake the pawn! Nxd5 6. Nxf7! [or 6. d4 is recommended by masters] Kxf7 7. Qf3+ Ke6 8. Nc3 eventual d4 0-0 Re1+ that's pretty annoying) Na5 (best move, to attack the bishop. Here, white has one extra pawn but black has many counter-attack possibility's and have a fast development).

The sacrifice on f7 is the Fried-Liver-Attack.

Trexler3241

 

Trexler3241
respecthebish1 wrote:

After bc4 the best reply is bc5. (d3 nf6 ng5 and u can castle and avoid any early attack)

There is no “best” reply

MarkWing97

The Polerio Defense is relatively safe. You can block the Bishop check with either a Pawn or a Bishop. Blocking with a Pawn seems to lose a Pawn but Black has more than enough compensation with how poorly developed White is.

Another way to completely side-step the Knight Attack variation is to simply develop the dark-squared Bishop to c5 before the Knight, as you're ready to castle and Ng5-f7 loses two pieces for a Rook and Pawn, which isn't advised.

 

GothamChessSubscriber1478

Fritz variation is goated for black if because they have no idea how to play it (unless they have studied then they just have better opening knowledge so your openings are going to suck against their theory) and it is good

Example Game

After 5 Nd4... you initiate the Fritz variation and if they see the checkmate they have to play 10 Qe2... and lose the queen with a terribly cramped position, if they know this then none of their tricks work and you play normal chess
HarryPotter1919

Fried liver attack can be defended by black by many ways

Wilsons_World
HarryPotter1919 wrote:

Fried liver attack can be defended by black by many ways

This post was made in 2018, at that time, the fried liver attack was making quite a large comeback in the chess world, while you are right, I believe that due to the elo of the creatoe of the post, he might have been in the prime time of the opening.

GothamChessSubscriber1478

I played someone who countered it improperly and hung their queen