Forums

Good classical defense against 1.d4 for club play

Sort:
yusuf_prasojo
Silfir wrote:... It can't be a Semi-Slav without ...c6. You're about as likely to "have to play" it as you are of accidentally writing a novel.

I don't understand what the above means

Silfir

It means that 1.d4 e6 2. c4 d5 is not Semi-Slav. Black won't "have to" play it. This is not exactly rocket science.

It should be quite apparent that if your favored openings are the QGD against 1.c4 2.d4 and the French against 1.e4, and you would decline the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit by transposing the French whenever it occurs anyway, there is no real reason to play ...d5 first. You can play ...e6 and check if White a) thinks "oooh uncontested center" and abandon his plans of Queen's Gambit for a French, or b) possibly avoids opening 1.e4 because he fears responses OTHER than 1...e6 and is quite happy to play it. Meaning it's not much of a trick; White will be quite prepared for the French if he plays 2.e4.

Nothing about 1...e6 as a reply to 1.d4 bears even a trace of forcing Black into a Semi-Slav if he doesn't want to.

yusuf_prasojo

Ooops... Silfir, you're absolutely right!

Czechman

Well, the consensus ssems to indicate that any opening is a good opening if you know how to play it. Wink So, I'll get myself a copy of Fundamental Chess Openings (excellent suggestion!) and shop around for something that suits my style.

ENDGAME STUDY is definitely a high priority to me and I'll study, but I've only been back for a couple months and there's only so many hours in a day. Gotta' start somewhere and unless I can get through the opening and middle game I'll never see an end game.

Thanks to everyone who made a suggestion, they are all very helpful and appreciated.

Grikeyes

Nimzo indian defense tops all of these

Fairy_Princess
Grikeyes wrote:

Nimzo indian defense tops all of these

It is not a classical defense.

toiyabe

Tartakower QGD

jdcannon

What about the KID?

The plan here is pretty simple... move your knight from f6 push the f and g pawns down the board and attack untill the cows come home... You don't have to worry about being any good at the end game because if your attack fails the endgame is so bad for you that it wont matter if your krammik.

ChessinBlackandWhite

If you play the french then I suggest playing 1....e6 against d4 also. many opponents with then play e4 and you get a french. If they play anthing else just play Nf6 and go into a nimzo indian, very comfortable for french players in my experience

ChessinBlackandWhite

and to add this is what I play and I would say at least 1/3 of my games against d4 end up into a normal frnech almost immediatly. 

dtrossen

I also am a big believer in 1.d4 e6 with the idea of transposing to a normal Nimzo/QID/QGD, which are my 1.d4 defenses.

In my experience, I only occassionally get a French transposition (maybe 15%), so that is not my main motivation.  The key for me is that I play the Sicilain Taimanov and French, and thus play 1.d4 e6 2.Nf3 c5!?  I've found this opening sequence highly effective at club level, particularly in keeping the position dynamic enough to allow wins against lower rated players who special in some offbeat d-pawn line.

I could see the theoretical drawback of allowing a French at FM+ levels.  I do not believe there is any drawback at USCF class A / expert levels.

ChessinBlackandWhite

I also like to throw in the early c5 at times

And as a note there have been a couple french openings at the tata steel so far, at least one yesterday :)