So what you think would be good? I would appriciate any suggestions.
I need eight openings. Four each for white and black.
Broken down into two general categories.
1. e4 - positional 1. d4 - positional If you want a system you can learn in an hour and use for a lifetime with Black is to play the following four moves to get your opponents out of book safely: 1...g6/2...Bg7/3...e6/4...Ne7 I call this the Universal attack. In order to know how to play this system, you must rethink what time is. In Classical Chess, time is defined by how many pieces you have developed. In this system time is controlled space. The more controlled space you have, the more time you have.
When GM Yasser Seirawan annotated a game by Anatoly Karpov, he made the comment that Karpov was the most "confounding player he had ever see. You will note that he has all his pieces on the first and second rank but stands better!" What Karpov understands better than any other Grandmaster is how to use controlled space.
What distinguishes my system as opposed to an other opening is that I never play d6. You must always play d5 in one move ASAP to contest the White center quickly. Then grab one square at a time and just push your opponent off the board. Force White to declare his intentions when it comes to castling; in one Golden Knights tournament, I played the first five moves in all thirty games, the fifth being 5...O-O. You will note that it is impossible for White to attack in the opening quickly with the exception of an early h4/h5.
The kinds of moves you will want to make are things like d5/Nd7/c5/b6/Bb7/a6/Rc8/Qc7 & and just react to whatever White plays. You will find that a lot of your opponents will go into a long think after 4...Ne7 and 5...d5 because they have never seen it before.
1. e4 - sharp 1. d4 - sharp
don't play the sicillian at your level (and my level), it is very complicated, and you can spend a long term learning it. Play e5 or e6 as black.
This brings up a question I've always had.
Is a particular opening more complicated because there's more variations associated with it that you have to account for? And if so, aren't the various variations based on sound chess principles?
In other words...if my opponent plays 1. e4 and I respond with 1...c5 then I've essentially played the Sicilian and I should try and base my subsequent moves on sound opening principles (e.g. develop your pieces, protect your King etc. etc. )
I mean I still have to make those same sort of decisions if I play 1...c6. right?
So what makes one so much more complicated than the other that I should avoid it?
"Opening principles" is usually just an aid to beginners, nothing more. And The Sicilian (some, not all variations) pretty much break every opening principle there is.