How do I invent/publish my own opening?

Sort:
Avatar of kurtwarnerqb

It sounds kind stupid, but I made a response to the Indian, which is: 1. d4 Nf6 2. e4 Nxe4 3. c3 d5 4. Nf3

Avatar of Bowser

what is the purpose of 2. e4? it gives away a central pawn for no compensation.

Avatar of kurtwarnerqb
Bowser wrote:

what is the purpose of 2. e4? it gives away a central pawn for no compensation.

It's called the Omega Gambit, but idk if its that good.

Avatar of ThrillerFan
TheRisingPhoenixism wrote:
Bowser wrote:

what is the purpose of 2. e4? it gives away a central pawn for no compensation.

It's called the Omega Gambit, but idk if its that good.

If you have no idea if it is any good, then there is no use in trying to invent it, let alone publish it!

SMH!

Avatar of Foul_Creature

What you said is indeed stupid. Don't try to publish that.

Avatar of kurtwarnerqb
ThrillerFan wrote:
TheRisingPhoenixism wrote:
Bowser wrote:

what is the purpose of 2. e4? it gives away a central pawn for no compensation.

It's called the Omega Gambit, but idk if its that good.

If you have no idea if it is any good, then there is no use in trying to invent it, let alone publish it!

SMH!

yeah I guess its kinda bad, I will try to invent another opening

Avatar of Hoon_Doggo

You can't really invent a new opening. Almost all of the combinations of the first 1-3 moves have a name unless they are really trash, and even some that are bad have names, like the Ware Opening.

Avatar of BIGSHADOWWARRIOR
TheRisingPhoenixism wrote:
ThrillerFan wrote:
TheRisingPhoenixism wrote:
Bowser wrote:

what is the purpose of 2. e4? it gives away a central pawn for no compensation.

It's called the Omega Gambit, but idk if its that good.

If you have no idea if it is any good, then there is no use in trying to invent it, let alone publish it!

SMH!

yeah I guess its kinda bad, I will try to invent another opening

make bongcloud variants

Avatar of kurtwarnerqb
Hoon_Dogg wrote:

You can't really invent a new opening. Almost all of the combinations of the first 1-3 moves have a name unless they are really trash, and even some that are bad have names, like the Ware Opening.

it probably is kinda hard but I think i made a better one, here it is: 1. f4 f5 2. b3 Nf6 3. Bb2
idk what to name it but, is this a good one or bad one?

Avatar of Optimissed

It's been done before.

Avatar of BlueHen86
TheRisingPhoenixism wrote:
Hoon_Dogg wrote:

You can't really invent a new opening. Almost all of the combinations of the first 1-3 moves have a name unless they are really trash, and even some that are bad have names, like the Ware Opening.

it probably is kinda hard but I think i made a better one, here it is: 1. f4 f5 2. b3 Nf6 3. Bb2
idk what to name it but, is this a good one or bad one?

As Optimissed mentioned, it's been done before, and Black has scored better than White. I'd say it's bad.

Avatar of putshort
Omega gambit, why c3 is played? .
Avatar of 1Lindamea1
Thats just double dutch
Avatar of kurtwarnerqb
Optimissed wrote:

It's been done before.

I know it's the Bird's Opening but it's a variation of it i guess.

Avatar of play4fun64

@Chessable_Bro

What FIDE ratings can benefit from chess publishing subscription?

Avatar of magipi
play4fun64 wrote:

@Chessable_Bro

What FIDE ratings can benefit from chess publishing subscription?

I wonder if the spambot will answer you. Hmmm, difficult question.

Avatar of play4fun64
magipi wrote:
play4fun64 wrote:

@Chessable_Bro

What FIDE ratings can benefit from chess publishing subscription?

I wonder if the spambot will answer you. Hmmm, difficult question.

It's worth the try 😎

Avatar of AngryPuffer

Step 1: Find a non refutable opening variation

Step 2: Become a master level player.

Step 3: Play it and win with it alot

Step 4: Watch all the other masters copy and experiment with the opening as well.

Avatar of hawhawhomersimpson

I made a new opening it is called the Desmond opening . This one is called the Desmond opening ,

Dog variation

Avatar of hawhawhomersimpson

Play it its good if you get into that position