Qxb2 doesn't help...
How to Blast out Kings gambit???
Sort:
Yeah, apparently chess.com just bans players that promote new ideas. They banned whatupyodog, twice, because he was a high rated parham user, and also closed the parham thread... I'm a 1400 so as long as I keep my rating low they'll probably not ban me.
They banned whatupyodog because he was cussing out the general chess.com population, and closed the thread for the same reason.
Is the Fischer Defence one of the better defences for black against Kings Gambit? Theoreticly i mean then. Kings Gambit has been seen a few times at the highest level lately also. Diden´t Nakamura play a Muzio Gambit? What else has been played among the top GMs the few times they have played it?
alexlaw wrote:
^ we've said that quite a few times.
They banned whatupyodog because he was cussing out the general chess.com population, and closed the thread for the same reason.
We still need to say it more so he gets the point.
The_Gavinator wrote:
Yeah, apparently chess.com just bans players that promote new ideas. They banned whatupyodog, twice, because he was a high rated parham user, and also closed the parham thread... I'm a 1400 so as long as I keep my rating low they'll probably not ban me.
So, watch out till they find out that you and whatup are the same person, or just two friends who were bored, and got in here to spam the site with nonsense.
"Parham instantly winning"
Chess.com: (Opening Explorer)
| 2...Nc6 | 5 |
|
Chessgames.com: (Opening Explorer)
 |
||||||
| 2...Nc6 | 11 |
|
||||
Chesscafe.com:
Of course the shock value of 2. Qh5 is much
less in a classical tournament game than in a
blitz game. One cannot expect wonders from a
surprise second move.
Nakamura got what he could have expected: an
equal position with only a slight pull. He lost
the game not because of the opening, but because he didn't want to resign himself
to a dull draw.
Nakamura,H (2657) • Sasikiran, 13th Sigeman & Co 2005
1. e2•e4 e7•e5 2. Qd1•h5 Nb8•c6 3. Bf1•c4 g7•g6 4. Qh5•f3 Ng8•f6 5. Ng1•e2
Bf8•g7 6. Nb1•c3 d7•d6 7. d2•d3 Bc8•g4 8. Qf3•g3 Qd8•d7 9. f2•f3 Bg4•e6 10.
Bc1•g5 Nf6•h5 11. Qg3•h4 h7•h6 12. Bg5•e3 Nc6•a5 13. Bc4•b3 Na5xb3 14.
a2xb3 a7•a6 15. d3•d4 Qd7•e7 16. Qh4•f2 e5xd4 17. Be3xd4 Nh5•f6 18. 0•0•0 0
•0•0 19. Ne2•f4 Rh8•g8 20. Rh1•e1 Kc8•b8 21. Kc1•b1 g6•g5
22. Nf4•e2 A sign of things to come. White
could have forced a draw here easily, but he
wants to keep some play in the position.
Further in the game he disdained equality
again, until his position deteriorated into a loss.
http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hans106.pdf
Nakamura lost that game because he made an error midgame, he had a winning position but played too aggressively, I think it was move 23, he stated he blundered and lost.
Also, everyone on this site swears, whatupyodog was just the only one who had different ideas. Pfren swears like a sailor, jetfighter dropped an f-bomb, which is actually what closed the Parham thread, and btw where did you all get the idea whatupyodog and I were the same person...?
Considering everything you've tried to say on my thread about the scotch was incorrect, I wouldn't be talking. Also, whatupyodog was rated 200 points higher than you, and we just go to the same school.
May 22, 2012
0
#93
I also haven't dropped an f-bomb on this site, whatup only edited my quote, I think the site needs to get rid of this feature.
Then why is it a quote?
May 22, 2012
0
#95
The_Gavinator wrote:
Then why is it a quote? Because I can do this ********
I edited the quote, I think they ment for people to post in a different color thier analasies on certain lines, but this got carried away as we can see.
Then chess.com should probably work on their software...
May 22, 2012
0
#97
no they just need to edit it so that you can't do that to other people's posts.
Which is what I just said...
May 22, 2012
0
#99
not specificaly, you just said they need to work on thier software...
Actually, He's a USCF 1750, and you were pretty wrong. You said Italian is not equal for black, 3/4 lines were equal for black. You said mainline was much better for white, go in a few moves past all the beginner's mistakes, black was equal. You said further on it was all spectacular wins, black had like a 70% win. I think you were just wrong. And I don't like playing on here because everyone aborts when they're black, so it's just me playing the sicilian over and over again. I'm an 1850 on chesscube though.
Looking at your game, Jetfighter lost (or is losing) because of greed. That was a simple fork trick, when your up two pieces you don't need to worry about getting more material. Just stop the attack, and come out with a win.