How to conquer the colossal obstacles of learning openings

Do you have access to a database? There are plenty of games there. You could even try annotating them yourself to try to understand the ideas better. Make sure you take a lot of time trying to figure things out though, and only use a computer at the end to check tactics.

Perhaps the opening books you have are targeted to players who are already quite familiar with those openings. Look for something with more text and less variations. The "starting out" series by everyman might fit the bill, or maybe you could go for some books that give the general plans of all the openings without bombarding you with variations. I think Watson wrote a good series of books like that, but I don't have any of them.

I memorize lines and it works for me. Buy modern chess openings an amazing book

Noodlex you can go to chessgames.com and find a lot of stuff there. You just type in opening and you can have access to more games that you will know what to do with.

I've been struggling on and off with the task of learning openings.

I keep telling myself that the solution is to move to Fisher Random Chess (Chess 960).  I feel it's just a matter of time before I give up regular chess and completely move to Chess 960 - but I'm still resisting this ultimate fate.

Everyman Chess publishes so called "Starting Out"-series on openings where each volume is intended as an introductory treatment of some particular opening system (for example STARTING OUT: THE QUEEN'S GAMBIT DECLINED is one title). These books should apparently contain more textual explanation than your average opening book. Now, I haven't actually read any of these books but I've heard good things about them and you may want to check few to see if you like them. These days there should be other literature also containing explanation of ideas - the opening books are really much better than they used to be.

Annotated games can be found on chess magazines, books, many websites (chessbase, chesscafe...)... Of course not all games in these sources are in your openings and the standard of analysis greatly varies but one can find plenty of good material there. Perhaps you can also consider purchasing an annotated game collection from a GM regulary playing your openings. Incidentaly, one good idea that I've seen often mentioned is to pick a famous player whose style you like and then copy his/her opening repertoire or at least part of it. Then by going through this players games you also get more familiar with your own openings.

But really the most important thing is to put in some hard work and think using your own brains. One can figure out many secrets about openings without anybody's explanation just by analysing and making good use of databases - and if your own brains faill you can try to consult computer, your chess playing friends, chess.com forums etc.). Imo the main purpose of learning openings should not be to learn zillions of concrete variations but rather to get familiar with arising positions - for this purpose analytical work is essential.

1. I don't think that your approach of trying to memorize everything will work. Your opponent can simply deviate from the theoretical line and then what? In general, it's good to learn the main line of an oppening only when you know why that line is the main line.

2. At your rating of ~1000 in blitz, do you think it's worth spending so much time on openings? I'd suggest you forget about opening books, go out, play anf have fun!

• cool dude,.,.,.,.,.,.,

>>>4 years ago, i doubt he still checks this thread

He hasn't logged on for three years. I'm guessing he doesn't really care.