I have engineered a new opening-any comments welcome

I have been trying to find a formation that is easy to use and practical to play, with control of center.

The thing I like about Reti's is that when your knights will fight in the center, they will uncover to Bishops for fighting heavier and guarding.

Benko Gambit has been popular, but my(if it was not discovered earlier) new spider/crab formationcan put an end to its fame, because it makes the two rooks useless.

It is not a formation full of flaws, but after analysing I found it's two flaws that a gambit of central pawns can punish severely, I call it the Anti-Spider Formation, because it is to destroy my Spider formation.

It begins with the english opening, and places all pieces on squares from where they can work as needed. When it becomes important, White(As it moves first, I try to engineer openings from there) can open the center in a stylish fashion.

The bishops dominate biggest diagonal, and can create threats whenever needed. Knights are mobile enough to go wherever they are needed, even to center when it opens(it is not a good idea to place the in center at beginning).

Queen and rooks are placed in the way that Chess mentor's "perfect position" suggested. It is also to dominate the central files as soon as they are open for rooks, and defend the most essential 2nd rank containg some vulnerable squares by queen.

Kingside and queenside are heavily fortified, so enemy can not attack from there, so it concentrates its attack while enemy may not get enough moves to defend all at once, and he will lose material if he tries Kside or Qside for attack.

Both bishops are good bishops. Bishops can use it as an open position whil knights can work as a closed one. If any piece  is threated, it has plenty of safe squares.

King is safe in corner.What I like about KID is that it prevents back rank mate and uses each piece very well for defence, so I included a part of that here.

Center is not occupied, but is in control, and that is one of its main attractions.

It only has 3 major flaws:-

1. It is not easy to play. One has to prevent opponent's pawns from coming forward and if he decides to gambit his pawns while preventing the formation to complete if gambit is denied, they must be accepted else whole pawn structure is ruined.
2. If any pawn is pinned from 'd' to 'h' file(except 'g', because the king can take care of that)(especially e and h pawns), especially vertically(Pinning diagonally is hard in it), the whole pawn structure can be ruined if white is not willing to lose lots of material.
3. The queen is well protected, but not very safe. If opponent finds best counterplay, she is endangered to death.

BONUS: If opponent sacrifices a or two piece(s)(preferably minor), he can ruin your entire pawn structure and threaten some dangerous tactics while maintaing a good square to get in your base(though any piece sacrifice can do that, but it involves some points the opponent can unleash terror and all these 3 at once.

Finally, here is the spider included with anti spider. Though you may find black better here as it is well thought counterplay against spider, Just see position of white with any other opening. I posted this here due to two main reasons:-

1. A big good chess community(else even this site was nothing)

2. Good position on search engines(so that people can easily find and use it if it is good)

3. People I play, I can defeat even when we start with me having undeveloped positions and they having entire board, even when they are having constant mating threats and I am having nothing. So, they just like to play some variants of luck/easy ones/less speed against me. eg. Aaauuurrghh! Chess, Atomic Chess and Shatranj/Chaturanga(Both have just a minute difference).

If you want variants, try http://chessvariants.org

Finally, here is the opening/formation(Though it is a formation, but they are also part of openings only, while pure openings are just preparing pawn structures) with the counterplay I found. Sorry for making you wait, but the wait is now over and you understood the opening. If you haven't, use comments section to ask. I can only answer about moves and position, not sequence.

NOTE(MUST READ BEFORE COMMENTING): Please don't do injustice to it by comparing with tactical blows in between. It is more a formation than an opening. What I have given is a sample sequence to reach to this formation with a counterformation based of flaws I discovered. Just forget what are the moves, feel final position from either side. Also see this position of white(you may check the same formation from Black, because colour does not restrict it) with any other opening system, and only then you will have understood the moves, and read the intro above for basic ideas of this opening and possible sources. If still you have questions/suggestions/thoughts about it, go ahead. I thought the word "formation" explains it all.

And yes, if your question is "Why Black queen lost a tempo?", the answer is that I needed one extra move from white to complete the formation. With this Anti-Spider, White is having no good moves for coping with threats on e3 and f2 squares. If you ask "Why can't white simply advance some pawns?", the suggestion is good but it weakens beyond repair. Black's queen can take care to squares outside white base and will easily penetrate through those squares, ruthlessly killing in the way.

If you feel like that, though I am not surprised that it would have more flaws than I found, I would even accept the comment, but as it is a formation of which I can find no database, not wishing to point at you, such comments must have at least a little bit of explanation. It is a stylish opening which can work out with most of the openings and Gambits, but even machines are designed to play only their opening book, and there are almost a 100 types of openings, so on a universal basis, if you think any of the move is useless, can you please support your comment?

I did consider it, and myself playing both white and black, I knew the intentions behind those gambits. If I took them with pawns, there would be two problems. Firstly, Black already got  a good position by those gambits and already rare people like to lose their central pawns. Black would soon swallow those two pawns which would be in his mouth, and white would get no compensation while black would. So White could be said 2 pawns behind. If he decides to hold, then the game gets complex and Black is in an angry, aggressive position and would take pawns at any cost, with their defenders. The game would get so complicated and out of calculation, added that even if a battle ends fairly to the endgame, it is the defender who has problems, and someone who can't play and calculate very well would lose material, position and everything, also transposing to a game involving complex calculations. Secondly, taking with the pawns takes away entire style and elegance of the opening, and you will have to play like barbarians. When they are taken with Knights, who will have to go back-a quality which pawns lack-to cover the bishops to deal strong attacks later as well as to defend the base till game is open from white, black does not care to take them back as they would never stay in same file while moving and will go back, by themselves or by threatening, white took them with knights to retain the material. When those pawns are taken, taking with K- and Q- pawns and opening the center like that is its style, which should be given away only when winning material.

Looks like something from Shatranj.

Looks like total crap do play this if you want to lose always

don't get hurt or anything. but this is really bad. u need to study the established openings more.

Why would black intentionally give away a pawn, particularly a center pawn, to play a variation of the Dutch with no compensation for it? And now black does not have his/her queen's pawn to help solidify his pawn position? If you can show me the compensation for black voluntarily giving up a pawn, I'm willing to listen.

You say: 

1. The queen is well protected, but not very safe. If opponent finds best counterplay, she is endangered to death.

But this is absolutely wrong. The queen is very safe, but not well protected.

You go on to say, "If opponent finds best counterplay, she is endangered to death?" Sure, but what if she's not a she?! What if opponent is a he, or transgendered in some progessive way... then the counterplay gets complicated, potentially arousing. You probably didn't even realize that endangered is an anagram for engendered. Don't check. It is.  

Keep up the good work though. 

I can't believe I read this wall of text. But for the purpose of entertaiment here is Houdini 4 analysis for both sides. Hahahaha!  

At move ten isn't black giving up a rook?

Don't be too dicouraged Jatin, its just that its extremely unlikely to come up with a good opening that hasn't been seen before as they have been studied for centuries by the best players in the world.

However your post was creative and well presented so if you put your mind into your game you could do well :). Make sure you don't neglect other parts of the game by focussing too much on the opening though.

@JG27Pyth
"You probably didn't even realize that endangered is an anagram for engendered."

do you even anagram bro?
3 e and 1 a vs 4 e - close but no cigar

It's intersting and I like your creative thinking but this is a weird opening that I would not play (I'm a beginner so it looks tough) I like the idea of the knignts coming to attack but I think there are a lot of counter moves that would break your opening. But that's my own idea. Nice creativity! -KH

2) .....d5 is the key move to the opening, it allows white

to think he's ahead here. false sense of security, so

that the spider can spring his trap, probably be in chess player mag. soon.

The opening above assumes your opponent will sacrifice both of his central pawns for no clear reason. Why would he do that? But keep experimenting, that's a good thing!

What puzzles me about this is how the White Knights totally waste tempo by first capturing a pawn and then moving right back to the starting point.

Well done !

The final positon looks funny but the opening is really bad...

@pfren -- Sometimes your tongue lashings in the past went too far imo, but I so much preferred your righteous scorn to this -- seeing you take this crap seriously enough to annotate it. I honestly find it depressing that you would waste your time, and validate with your attention, this empty nonsense. IMHO the only reasonable response to this dreary mildly mentally defective crap is to mock it. Actually, far better, ignore it. I should take my own advice.  I need to stop wishing there were more real chess content on these forums -- I've been here long enough to know how things stand.