I think I just invented the most unsound gambit ever.

Sort:
Avatar of V_mongoliensis

I was looking at the Double Muzio and thought "that sure leaves me with a lot of pieces I could blunder away" so I looked to see if there was a Triple Muzio. Finding out there wasn't, I proceeded to invent one.

(I actually did find 8. b3?! Qxa1 9. Nc3 on Wikipedia when I looked up Triple Muzio, but I didn't find a source, so I decided to combine that with Double Muzio for an actual Triple)

Avatar of Daeru
Avatar of NimzoRoy
 
Avatar of ivandh

Your logic is flawless. I think we can expect to see this come up in the next championship cycle.

Avatar of V_mongoliensis
NimzoRoy wrote:
8.b3 looks awful. My suggestion below probably sucks too if anyone cares to double-check it but probably not as bad as 8.b3
 

But your suggestion only sacrifices a bishop and a knight. More sacrifices to Cthulhu means more victory.

Avatar of chess_karma

I think 17. QF6 is better as it leads to mate.

Avatar of FLCL
Genius.
Avatar of 1RedKnight99

That would be interesting attacking the king. Also very unsound.

Avatar of moonnie

If there is an unsound gambit there is probably some german guy who already invented it before you