This is far from enough evidence to believe you beat the computer. And since you're only 20 yrs. old, there is just no way you could have possibly beat it.
I won against a computer here on chess.com!
Sort:
May 7, 2011
0
#2
I beat it all the time...never lost yet on the hard level!!!
LOL
trysts wrote:
This is far from enough evidence to believe you beat the computer. And since you're only 20 yrs. old, there is just no way you could have possibly beat it.
You have the right to be jealous, I get that. If I was able to beat it being only 20 years old means I'm a genius. Anyhow just wait until chess.com staff drops by. They probably have some record of the game being played. The date is there so they can track it wiht no problem and also they can verify that I played without chess engine assistance.
couchpotatoe wrote:
I beat it all the time...never lost yet on the hard level!!!
LOL
What ever dude. What ever makes you sleep at night.
LisaV wrote:
ooh, i had a sweetie from Novi Sad. sigh.
congrats on the win. sniffle.
Thanks for the comment. I really appreciate it. And sorry for the break up. We are not all bad just so you know. 
I've thought about this game and he seems completely legit. First of all, the computers on this website aren't very sophisticated. Milan managed to trick the computer into taking a "poisoned pawn" and thus won the game easily. I have seen this happen to 2600 ELO computers before so it's perfectly believable. Well done Milan!
And?.......
May 8, 2011
0
#9
It is very possible.
The computer often fails to see/prevents it is going to get mated next move.
ezhang wrote:
I've thought about this game and he seems completely legit. First of all, the computers on this website aren't very sophisticated. Milan managed to trick the computer into taking a "poisoned pawn" and thus won the game easily. I have seen this happen to 2600 ELO computers before so it's perfectly believable. Well done Milan!
Thanks man! You seem very sincere.
Well done! I've beaten the computer before, but I lose more than half the time :(
RoseQueen1985 wrote:
I beat the computer all the time. By the way naming your age as a way to prove yourself is idiotic and makes you look like an ass. No one cares if you are 20 or 60, it doesn't matter. What's worse, no one believes you. Even if you did beat the computer, so what? Lots of others have done it. The computer here is rather weak and wayy too materialistic for it's own good. So even if you did beat it it's no big deal.
No big deal! Do you live in a freshly painted house or something? And why nobody is showing proof of the win? And yes I'm trying to prove my self. I don't see you beating a computer. You can get sarcastic and all but I won. And this idiot, as you call me, is 10 times smarter than you.
MilanGlisic wrote:
Fist your eyes as I'm the offical chess King!
This hurts! Ow! I can't see what I'm typing!
Congrats on the win; glad to see that something makes you happy.
Deranged wrote:
Well done! I've beaten the computer before, but I lose more than half the time :(
Thanks!
May 8, 2011
0
#16
MilanGlisic wrote:
trysts wrote:
This is far from enough evidence to believe you beat the computer. And since you're only 20 yrs. old, there is just no way you could have possibly beat it.
You have the right to be jealous, I get that. If I was able to beat it being only 20 years old means I'm a genius. Anyhow just wait until chess.com staff drops by. They probably have some record of the game being played. The date is there so they can track it wiht no problem and also they can verify that I played without chess engine assistance.
I'm only really jealous, not super really jealous. But, if you beat the computer when only 20 years old, then that would indicate you're a genius. So if you're a genius, why do people walk backwards when doing the moon-walk? A true genius would know.
And also, I asked the staff about your alleged win, and they said Chess.com law forced them to drop all files of your alleged win in the ocean within 24 hours. So we can't even verify the game! Very suspicious...
I'm not drinking the cool-aid. Not that I think it is a big deal to beat the hard computer, but rather even if a winning position is achieved on a machine they play out the longest mate possible. 15. Ba6? No I'm sorry I don't think so. I think this was computer on easy and perhaps did a quick photoshop job.
Computer at the very least would have lost the queen and prolonged the mate.
trysts wrote:
MilanGlisic wrote:
trysts wrote:
This is far from enough evidence to believe you beat the computer. And since you're only 20 yrs. old, there is just no way you could have possibly beat it.
You have the right to be jealous, I get that. If I was able to beat it being only 20 years old means I'm a genius. Anyhow just wait until chess.com staff drops by. They probably have some record of the game being played. The date is there so they can track it wiht no problem and also they can verify that I played without chess engine assistance.
I'm only really jealous, not super really jealous. But, if you beat the computer when only 20 years old, then that would indicate you're a genius. So if you're a genius, why do people walk backwards when doing the moon-walk? A true genius would know.
And also, I asked the staff about your alleged win, and they said Chess.com law forced them to drop all files of your alleged win in the ocean within 24 hours. So we can't even verify the game! Very suspicious...
Well there is not much science behind moon walk originally known as backslide. The dancer performing the moon walk is overcoming friction by moving his weight on his foot and using the other foot to slide over the surface . Although it looks like he's making a move forward he's actually sliding his leg back after that he switches legs and repeats the process. It was Michael Jackson god bless his soul who named it "Moon Walk". People who invented it gave it the name "Backslide", not many people know that. I think it was a dance couple from Ohio, USA but don't take my word for it. And for the other matter I already gave proof for my win and I also think that any further discussion about that it's just silly.
nice way to boost ur self esteem lol
May 8, 2011
0
#20
MilanGlisic wrote:
trysts wrote:
MilanGlisic wrote:
trysts wrote:
This is far from enough evidence to believe you beat the computer. And since you're only 20 yrs. old, there is just no way you could have possibly beat it.
You have the right to be jealous, I get that. If I was able to beat it being only 20 years old means I'm a genius. Anyhow just wait until chess.com staff drops by. They probably have some record of the game being played. The date is there so they can track it wiht no problem and also they can verify that I played without chess engine assistance.
I'm only really jealous, not super really jealous. But, if you beat the computer when only 20 years old, then that would indicate you're a genius. So if you're a genius, why do people walk backwards when doing the moon-walk? A true genius would know.
And also, I asked the staff about your alleged win, and they said Chess.com law forced them to drop all files of your alleged win in the ocean within 24 hours. So we can't even verify the game! Very suspicious...
Well there is not much science behind moon walk originally known as backslide. The dancer performing the moon walk is overcoming friction by moving his weight on his foot and using the other foot to slide over the surface . Although it looks like he's making a move forward he's actually sliding his leg back after that he switches legs and repeats the process. It was Michael Jackson god bless his soul who named it "Moon Walk". People who invented it gave it the name "Backslide", not many people know that. I think it was a dance couple from Ohio, USA but don't take my word for it. And for the other matter I already gave proof for my win and I also think that any further discussion about that it's just silly.
Wow! You know too much about the moon walk! You're like some super-duper genius!!! Okay, I'm going to take off my S.C.U.B.A. gear, because I didn't want to spend the day looking for evidence. Thank goodness this thread doesn't sink to the depths of silliness
I played a game against a computer opponent. And i won! I was black and for those of you who don't belive me here is the proof. I'm 20 years old and m
y rating is 1600 and all started when I got a huge advantage in development after computer got gready and took my pawn. It was set on hard 2000+. I captured the image using Snagit. I only took the snapshot of the window and the notation as the hole browser image was a lot bigger. And this is was matters right! 
Fist your eyes as I'm the offical chess King! And of cource i didn't use a chess engine. I lost four games to it today before i won this one. I hope chess.com staff will reward me for this incredibal feat.