Is anything better for me than the Parham?

+1

Who needs debth when I can win on move 10? It's a game, the goal is to win. I don't need to play the ruy-lopez crap when I can win on move 10. Enough said.

honestly I screwed up in both games, after 5:00 eastern my chess degrades horendously, also I could probably beat you because overall my game is better, I just screwed up and wasn't paying attention, something that happens a lot I was also to materialistic, and was quite happy to take the free Bishop. anyway I like this game, and am pretty good, I learned that I had a complete advantage in my KG game until I started blundering like crazy( from about move 17 onward) and I could have had an advantage in the parham game if I ignored the bishop and played Bb7 at move 10. anyway, I would like it if you would not call us communists, because I believe firmly in the constitution, I only was tired of being told to f ourselves and other things of that nature. not because I have a bias against better players, I have lost to manny people who were much better than me, but they were always respectful about it, and gave me a free lesson in a way, and even a post mortem, also I could probably beat you but you won't accept a challange. plus since I didn't use an engine in either of those games, and since i didnt need an engine to get a winning position against a USCF 2000 (whatup- though judging by his play I am highly suspicious of that) why would I need one against you.

Lol how can you still go on about this?? You get crushed when using the KG, and get crushed against the Parham, but you STILL call KG good and Parham bad. HOW??? I mean are you like retarted? The object of chess is to WIN, not to LOSE, do you know the rules?

You can only win on move 10 when you are playing complete nubs, or they make a lucky blunder. Try playing higher rated players in 90 minute or 2 hour games over the board like I do. The chances of winning on move ten are slim unless you are a 2000+ playing an U1500. Even I, a 1500 rated player, can survive 30 - 60 moves against most GM's. Also, there is no way whatupyodog was 2000 USCF, that's a complete lie. At best he was 200.

I won't lose to them THE GAVINATOR, challenge me.

If you can get positions you're familiar with, and on top of it reach them with no disadvantage, then that's worth a lot.  Especially among amateurs if you're familiar with the standard type moves and they're not, it may be = but in practical terms you're almost definitely ahead.  In this case the Pharem (or any opening you take the time to play often and study) will do very well for you.

Add to this low rated players (like 99% of chess.com) arguing and playing games over theoretical advantage stuff is pretty silly, I think we all know that.  You may even call it immature.  But slamming other players just because you beat them has got to be 10x worse.  IMO anyway, one of the universal chess lessons is humility, because even our wins contain mistakes, and there's always someone better than we are.

He's actually around 1750, and here's my thing. Against players who truly know what they're doing (I'd say USCF 1500+?), you're not going to get a material advantage in the first 10 moves. But that's no matter what you're doing. So you're going to have to win on tactics, and endgame, if it comes to it. So if I'm not going to gain an advantage in the opening, why not play an opening that could give me a huge advantage? Most people aren't booked on it, and could crack under pressure.

yes I know the rules, call anyone another name, and I will report you,

I had a winning position at move 16. then started blundering horibly the next move. the other game was a complete oversight, I admit that, I hope you take into account that I have some 500 years of research on my side and all you have is 20someodd and a comment that said it was playable. I honestly think that 500 years wins out along with spassky Fischer, anderssen, Morphy, and many others. spassky and fischer could probably beat the tar out of naka. anyway, I am pretty sure I could beat you with the KG as white and against the parham as black BARRING OVERSIGHTS, because those are not cause by the opening, those are just oversights.

I did crack, though it was not an attack that naturauly flowed from the opening, in fact one could argue it was a last ditch effort that white tried to gain a decisive advantage that black fell for

See this is what I mean right here? He knows I'm better, and can't think of a way to stop the Parham, or to back the KG. Therefore he thinks "I can't beat The Gavinator", so let's just report him and get him banned. There's two kinds of moderators on sites, mods who do nothing, and mods who do too much, this site is the second kind, and I will probably be banned soon. I have done no namecalling in this last post, but I'm pretty certain I'm going to be banned, soley for the reason I have an idea that works, that nobody has found a line against, and because it is "unusual".

Why not play an opening that will give you at least some advantage. Any opening can give you a winning position if your opponent blunders, sound openings can give you as much of an advantage as the parham if your opponent blunders, yet even if your opponent doesn't blunder they will give you at least some advantage.

Yes, but a blunder in the Parham is much worse than a blunder in the Ruy Lopez. In the Parham you are constantly attacking, while in the Ruy lopez you are just kinda moving pieces.

You're enjoying this trolling way too much gavinator.

I wonder if mods can see even the deleted posts?  Heh, would be funny.

CHRISTIAN SOLDIER SAID F**S!!!! REPORT HIM, BANNNNN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And you guys can't find a way to fight off this opening, so I mean what do you expect? You hang material against it, and still call it bad.

Gavinator, the parham doesn't even attack. The ruy lopez attacks but more positionally, the aim is to put pressure on black until he crumbles. The sicilian is the real attacking line, as real as openings such as the evans gambit and the guico piano. I play QG and grunfeld the most commonly, and those openings involve attacks. Parham just moves the queen, it doesn't actually attack.

Also, when are you going to accept my online chess challenge? You call Alexlaw scared for not accepting but now you won't accept.

nope I will not report you Gavinator until you call some one a name or drop an f bomb

also I said none of those things, and I was refering to whatup, not you

anyway here is my analysis of the KG

here is the Parham

anyway I am open to some criticism, as long as it is kind, sugest a move and why, don't call anyone retarded, and don't say the line is stupid, I will not look at it unless it has a legitamate reason that can be proved on the board.

Alright, if gavinator thinks online players are cheaters I'll play him in live. I'm terrible at blitz though

funny thing is he was reffering to your post, so it is paraphrasing while using the actual context, hm, he was within his right,

I really don't like taking the back burner anymore, I am trying to help him feed his superiority complex and his narcisicm, if it will get him off our backs, then so be it.