ty bro but get back on topic.
Is anything better for me than the Parham?
Sort:
he looks sane enough
jetfighter13 wrote:
the title of worlds fastest man given to the person who runs a 4.01 fourty yard dash
Only America uses yards dumbass, the rest of the world is in meters.
Ok michael-g, please answer the topic directly. I don't want to read another 5-paragraph essay, list a few openings that are aggressive non-gambits.
And Cerebral-Assassin, I don't think it's possible for that guy to not be a genious.
No opening is only aggressive or only positional.Some tend to be more complicated , some tend to be more simple, other than that there are no other categories.
For example:
Kings Indian defense can be aggressive but can be positional too.The same is true for Sicilian , French defense , Dutch defense , Ruy Lopez and almost all sound openings.
The problem is that your very low understanding doesn't let you understand even that simple truth.
Forget what I said .Parham is the only "aggressive" opening indeed .Stick with it , you don't seem to be able to understand anything else anyway.
Ok, how about this. The Danish Gambit, 1. e4 e5 2. d4 exd4 3. c3 dxc3 4. Bc4 cxb2 5. Bxb2, is obviously more aggressive than, let's say the london system. I'd say it's safe to say there are some openings more aggressive than others.
If giving 2 pawns with doubtful compensation is called "aggresive", then yes Danish Gambit is aggresive.Truth is though that the only one attacking is Black.
Capablanca's early ...d5 against would-be Danish players has to lead to the dullest games of 1.e4 chess imaginable. A good scrap in the London leads to comparitive fireworks.
Elementary lesson No1 is the moves , in case you wonder.
I definitely agree with ciljettu.
Why not trying 2.Nf3 and playing the good old Ruy Lopez?:)
I'm fine, hope you're doing fine as well:)
ciljettu, that's not what I asked, I'd like a simple answer. Thank you janosik, you are one of the few people on here who actually answered the post. I just find the ruy lopez to be slightly dull and theory-heavy. I'd like to play something more fun and aggressive, however not a gambit so I won't be left in the dust if my attack fails. Do you have any recommendations?
Michael-G, how is black attacking after move 5? I think you might be the one who doesn't understand anything...
Because Nakamura played it and since OP and Nakamura have the same understanding , OP can play what Nakamura plays.Doesn't that sound reasonable?I hope no one is laughing.
I don't enjoy endgames very much, they are a weaker spot of my game. What do you recommend in the vienna?
Ciljettu , the only "punch " he needs is on his face but I really doubt if even that will make him understand his nonsense.
@ The_Gavinator
I think the Scotch could be a good fit for you.
Although there is some theory to be studied there as well, the Scotch is much more aggressive than the Ruy Lopez. Often times black gets quickly under pressure if he fails to equalize in the centre. Hope that helps a bit.
I have looked into that, how would you recommend replying to 4...Nf6? It seems most people exchange the knight on c6, then the wide open game is a little drawish..
Michael-G, please don't be rude. I'd just appreciate help, I don't need anybody being a jerk.
The fact that nneds a "punch" is the truth and not an insult.If he was my brother I would shake his head hard trying to make him understand.
In fact all you that act polite and "try" to help him you do more "damage" than I do.You make him think that what he says is not nonsense although it is , there is no doubt about it.We are talking about a 1300 rated player.Does anyone bothered o see his games?Because I did.How can suggesting an agressive opening to a player that doesn't understand even the basics , can help him?Someone from the polite ones please answer that.
If telling the truth and really trying to help someone to wake up is rude while lie to him and keeping him confused is polite , I will prefer to be rude.
dog demonstrates his mastery of the obvious.