Practice your positional play if you struggle on Queenpawn opening. You can also try to play the exchange variation. It often leads to sharp semi-open game.
is anything solid against d4
The Queen's is very strong and there is nothing that will give you an advantage, as always for black. However, you can survive and sometimes win with one of the queen's gambit declined variations, which are playable against any move order by white. If you are relatively tactical, then the Tarasch and possibly the Henig-Scharra gambit line of it will give you an open game. I am old and not as sharp as I once was, so I favor the Tartakover variation, although the Lasker is good also. Another idea is the king's Indian, which I see a lot of 1.e4 players using for their QP defense, although this is not as solid as the QGD and harder to learn. You can't expect to learn one of these lines quickly, you have to stick with it and get some appropriate reference materials with books or online. The problem with the Q indian is that you have to pair it with the nimzo in case of 3.Nc3, which is a great big kettle of fish in my opinion. A lot of 1. d4 players are better than the average 1. e4 player, but if you choose something and stick with it it will pay off.
semi-tarrasch defense pretty much gives white nothing; however, you won't you win as black as much either. I usually play semi-slav, but now im looking towards nimzo/bogo/queens indian..if you're playing queens you better know your stuff on nimzo and bogo.
I play 1.d4 myself and always have and I do find that a lot of 1.e4 player do play the KID but my results with that are better playing against it and I didnt like playing it myself. One of the reasons I'm looking into the QID is becasue of the Nimzo-Indian I keeo trying and dropping the Tarrasch so its so so with me and I dont know wwaht the Lasker or Tartakower variation is could you post a diagram ?
If you've tried so many different replies then you haven't given any of them a proper outing. Pick one and stick to it. I still play the Modern Benoni thirty-odd years later and have good results with it, despite it being "busted".
I don't know how to post diagrams, but if you just google the names of the different defenses, you will find a lot of references. Better yet, buy Modern Chess Openings. If you play 1.d4 2. c4 you surely have encountered these defenses before.
Many good responses to the OP's post and I thank you all because, like the OP, I can't stand the d4 opening. I just about consider the game lost. This thread has given me some ideas - thanks.
I play 1...f5 and dictate my own share of the opening. The Dutch has many themes, many styles, so you don't always have to play it the same way (Stonewall, Classical, Queenside Fianchetto, Leningrad, etc.), but you still get the control of e4, kingside play, a semi-closed position (with potential to open at your discretion!)...
Definitely a dynamic defense, that is perfectly acceptable, for anyone who wants to play for a win, and not be pushed around on the board.
I've tried the Slav, Semi-Slav, Budapest Gambit, Benko Gambit, KID, Horrwitz, Benoni, Modern/Robastch,Owens,Dutch, (not in this order) and I'm currently workin with the QID but I'm open to suggestions.
Maybe the bad deal is not in the opening but in the middlegame after it? Try to study some openings deeply and focuse not on first moves but on strategical ideas after opening.
I don't like repeating myself, but here goes! Have you taken any notice of what the great players play in response to 1.d4? It turns out that they play quite a wide array of defenses: Slav, QGD, http://www.chess.com/js/tiny_mce/plugins/spellchecker/img/wline.gif); background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: initial; cursor: default; background-position: 0% 100%; background-repeat: repeat no-repeat;">Nimzo/Queen's Indian, http://www.chess.com/js/tiny_mce/plugins/spellchecker/img/wline.gif); background-attachment: initial; background-origin: initial; background-clip: initial; background-color: initial; cursor: default; background-position: 0% 100%; background-repeat: repeat no-repeat;">Grunfeld, KID, and all with a great deal of success. So I can't believe that your problem has anything to do with there being no decent defense to 1.d4
So the problem must be you. I don't say this to insult you--the biggest problem with my chess game is certainly me!--but to make the point that the solution to your dilemma is not to constantly change defenses in the hope that you will discover a magic bullet. There is no magic bullet! Just pick a defense--any defense--and actually learn it. Not by trying to memorize moves, but by trying to understand the ideas and by playing over a lot of games by top Grandmasters to see how they handle it. Then play the opening many times. You will lose some games; when you lose, don't immediately decide that you need to switch openings. Instead, figure out what went wrong. And post some games for us to look at if you need help. The one thing you can count on at Chess.com is criticism! And some of it is useful.
Thanks but I almost never post games on chess.com cause barely or most of the time no one comments on others games from what I have been observing so I always thought it to be a waste of time although I'll post a game occasionally do you know of a chess.com group thats active and share games.
Thanks but I almost never post games on chess.com cause barely or most of the time no one comments on others games from what I have been observing so I always thought it to be a waste of time
go to http://www.chess.com/forum/ and select the "game analysis" forum. Maybe you haven't been posting them in the right spot. Anyway, I know that sometimes those posts go unanswered but I see many that create some feedback. You probably won't get hundreds of posts but you might get a few with good ideas.
I am totally with MrBlunderful on this one.
If you're looking for a solid defense against 1.d4, the Queen's Gambit Declined (QGD) and the Stonewall setup in the Dutch Defense are rocksolid openings. They have the added advantage that Black can steer play towards them fairly often (as opposed to, say, the queen's indian defense, which White can avoid). You should be careful about accepting the Queen's Gambit, however. Vladimir Kramnik has demonstrated many times over that the black position isn't as solid as it looks and you could end up suffering for a long time in that opening.
The Tartakower-Makogonov-Bondarevsky System (short: TMB) is an orthodox line of the QGD that involves a fianchetto of the light squared bishop that is solid as granite. Practicioners include both Karpov and Kasparov in their prime. I can recommend this system for anyone who needs a good defense against 1.d4.
Don't forget Spassky ! As a GM he never lost in this line until Fischer beat him in it. It was a big part of his black repertoire.....
most 1.d4 players are QG players
sometimes you see a lost London system ( which gains some ground)
there are 3 items which to consider,
- you know the white player and know his play
- you are not sure what to play, and want to rely on white's second and third move.
in this case e6 is the most flexible , and allows you to do many of the third possibilities straight away
- the black lion ( zwarte leeuw) defense is playable, ( reversed english/reti, in which piece development is paramount rather than committing one self to a certain opening
dutch classic
dutch stonewall
dutch leningrad
benoni old/new
my favs : bogo-indian , wolga and wolga/benko combo
you may notice the absense of QGD and QDA becasue these are most of the times the "rehearsed" openings of the white player, chess is also playing the man, and playing their weak points.
Tactical, aggressive and counterattacking is hard...
But solid? That's easy!
I can give you at least three really, truly, magnificently solid replies to 1.d4 that as an added bonus, have spectacular opening books available that are aimed at amateur and club level players (with a focus on ideas, plans, strategies, etc., rather than brute-force theory).
1. The QGD. Relevant books - The Queen's Gambit Declined, by Sadler...and Chess Explained: The Queen's Gambit Declined, by Rizzitano (neither gives an entire repertoire, but that's okay, since you can use the QGD moves AS an entire non-e4 repertoire)
2. The QGA. Relevant book - How to Beat 1.d4, by Rizzitano (gives an entire repertoire based around the QGA, and lines with an early ...c5 and ...Qb6 against the d-pawn specials).
3. The Stonewall Dutch. Relevant book - Win With the Stonewall Dutch, by Johnsen (again gives an entire repertoire).
agreed
I do agree that the Stonewall is by far the most solid of the Dutch setups, and can also be reached via 1...e6, if Black doesn't want to face "pesky" anti-Dutch lines. But otherwise, 1...f5 always provides entertainment, and many 1. d4 players loathe to face it!
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
I have for as long as I've played chess have been going through multiple defenses against 1.d4 same as 1.e4 but very few changes with good success from each change but when I play against 1.d4 I can't stand it I usually struggle the entire game opening to end even when I spend a whole 2 hours or longer trying to get use to a new opening and play practice games with it etc... and the same level of struggle happens and I dont mean even struggle I mean like I struggle to survive. Is there any defense or system or way of trasnposition or even a gambit someone can suggest to me ? I've tried the Slav, Semi-Slav, Budapest Gambit, Benko Gambit, KID, Horrwitz, Benoni, Modern/Robastch,Owens,Dutch, (not in this order) and I'm currently workin with the QID but I'm open to suggestions.