dark guess I disagree with you,
Take for example the scandinavian. I have won many games with Black with this opening up to and including grandmaster. Also wrote a book on that opening. And my games are in books on the scandinavian played later than my book. If you learn and know a particular opening at a high level you learn the good lines Against that opening. Now I know how to play against that opening and think White has very strong lines which might even refute that opening?
What I know about the Pirc is White has very strong lines against it When these lines are known [and they will be known] Black will be sorry he ever played the Pirc as one of his main defenses to 1. e4
dark there are lines against the Pirc which give Black little chance to equalize.
There are better lines than the Pirc.
the pirc is used even by Super GM's to fight for a win.
all respectable defenses equalize. Some just take longer than others.
in fact, the main drawback of the pirc is that black has to do most of the heavy theory since white has so many different ways to at keep a small advantage to equalize whereas black has to play in narrow corridors. But there is nothing "weak" about it. All the secondary defenses (scandinavian, pirc/modern, alekhine, Nimzowitsch, Owen ) are playable at all levels, but a big reason for their inferiority in top level games is that they lack the flexibility of the big 3 or the solidity of the Caro Kahn.