Most gambits become more and more unsound in higher level play.
Smith -Morgan gambit is better for black side in term of strong play (computer chess level).
As chess is very drawish and one extra pawn is generally not enough to win . (KP v K = draw , KBP v KB = draw , KRPvKR= draw etc). White can play smith morgan in two reasons,
1. I will take the risk by giving away a pawn and if black cant figure out the best play, I will beat him.
2. If black can figure out, I will be in inferior position but I should be able to drag for draw.
Example of two games of two strongest chess players in the world!
Your games mean nothing since none of your engines found Logozar's refutation.
Those are examples of game play for smith morgan gambit.
If he would like to find his refutation, he has to run his stockfish or serach in ICCF database (where people run stockfish for 1 positon for 2 weeks)
Most gambits become more and more unsound in higher level play.
Smith -Morgan gambit is better for black side in term of strong play (computer chess level).
As chess is very drawish and one extra pawn is generally not enough to win . (KP v K = draw , KBP v KB = draw , KRPvKR= draw etc). White can play smith morgan in two reasons,
1. I will take the risk by giving away a pawn and if black cant figure out the best play, I will beat him.
2. If black can figure out, I will be in inferior position but I should be able to drag for draw.
Example of two games of two strongest chess players in the world!
Your games mean nothing since none of your engines found Logozar's refutation.