14601 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
@ Wilber's - thanks! I also appreciate you bringing up your question. It's why I have refrained from playing e5 after e4.
After reading the following posts, perhaps my reluctance to play e5 in response to e4 might be a concern I can now dismiss.
Benko Gambit and NimzoIndian. Just annoying openings i like to really win those games.
This (i.e.) Bowlder Attack
Here are some traps to look out for against the Bowlder Attack.
Twinchicky, in your diagram, White can play 11. d4 to protect the knight.
Crushing 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 h6:
The knight sac on move 17 was probably dubious and unnecessary, but I was winning anyway.
Ofcourse i could name moves that I never see in my OTB games like 1. f3 or something but since I never get them i am not too bothered.
Normal Slav (with dxc4 / Bf5 / Bb4) mainly for 2 reasons. 1) It is hard to get anything solid against it where white has a clear plan and 2) It is hard to sideline it (with for example g3).
Yeah, the one I don't know how to respond to xD
Hehe, who said I don't enjoy going all nuclear thermonal war on people? Neh, the beauty of chess is that each player gets to pick his/her own moves (unless forced). I feel these players are cheating on their own. Many times when someone tries the fried liver and I refute it, it's over for them. The memorized trick didn't work. Now what should I do? (don't get me wrong though, when someone falls in a carefully planned trap that I put up, I also enjoy it, but I (try) to make sure I can finish the game if they won't fall for it!
What is this "refutation" of the fried liver you speak of? Is it this?
EDIT: 8...Nb4 is easily defensible by 9. Bb3, I think.
Other than Bb3, white can simply ignore the fork and continue the attack. This is especially useful in blitz and bullet.
The only ones I can think of that kinda annoy me are the random e4 gambits like the max lange, scotch gambit, danish etc.
May I ask what you inserted into your post? Is it a diagram, puzzle, game board?
I keep seeing - http://grab.by/sIKw Anyone else with the same problem?
I was quoting Twinchicky's post on the first page. It was a line in the Fried Liver. And yes, I am facing the same problem :/
scholars mate after scholars mate after scholars mate after scholars mate
YES! Especially when it's done by really strong players who are so hard to defend correctly against.
The London System and Exchange French (though I no longer play the French, and never need to worry about the latter). They are the dumbest openings ever. You might as well offer a draw on move 3 in both cases.
Even the Colle, Torre, and Trompowsky (which even I have played all 3 of these at some point) have winning possibilities, but the London is a dead draw from the get-go!
People that know me know that I've played just about every opening under the sun. Everything from the normal Najdorf Sicilian, Petroff, Caro-Kann, French, Alekhine, Modern, etc to the offbeat Owen's Defense, Balogh Counter-Gambit, Sokolsky, and Tubingen Gambit (1.Nc3 Nf6 2.g4), but I can still say to this day that I have never played the London System or the Exchange French as White. NEVER! About the closest thing I've ever played was the Dangerfield Attack against the Dutch (1.d4 f5 2.Bf4 Nf6 3.e3, but note the lack of Nf3 until Black commits one way or another, and even here, the ideas are completely different than that of the London System. For example, in many cases, g4 (against the Stonewall setup) or h4 (against Leningrad setups) are played. The London? They just move that pawn to h3, slip the Bishop down to h2, crawl into a hole, and do nothing, and draw!
Would you play the London against a player who was much stronger in hopes of a draw? Especially if a draw is all you need to win your section?
It's interesting that some of the "annoyed" are irritated that their opponents play openings that force them to work hard.I rather enjoy allowing my opponent to play their pet line...and then trying to win anyway.
I hate those openings (by whatever names) that put me in an anxious state by move 13. I dislike the openings that fill me with dread at the thought of my rating going down. I abhor the openings that cause me to move my pieces around just to stay alive.
The wing gambit vs the smith morra gambit
by Derekjj 4 minutes ago
Game times out?
by baddogno 5 minutes ago
average time per move
by Mozzamon 11 minutes ago
Analysis Board on Chess.com!?
by berkleyso8462 11 minutes ago
Who is GM "Siana" ???
by MrMetrics 13 minutes ago
2/7/2016 - Quick And Painless
by macer75 18 minutes ago
Ruy Lopez Mistake!
by Kickassassin 19 minutes ago
Post your Travel Chess Sets
by n9531l 21 minutes ago
State of Chess.com Round Two! Post your questions here:
by Senior-Lazarus_Long 25 minutes ago
2/8/2016 - Neumann-Hernandez Dresden 1969
by NathanielFerneau 26 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!