looking for good openings to win fast!!

Sort:
sndeww

sorry, but just because you win doesn't necessarily mean it's the opening that gets credit. 

To answer your original question, no there isn't a "good opening to win fast" because people just don't play "that opening" all the time, so more than likely you're gonna learn it for no real reason. Better to learn to calculate so that your pieces don't hang, and then maybe some opening theory will help.

sndeww
redzippyquest wrote:

I agree with @SNUDOO on this topic

"on THIS topic"

 

nice

Luigi4011

Yeah fianchettos are pretty cool

duntcare

play one that suits you, i play the sicilian a lot cause im aggressive, dutch sometimes, french rarely(i used to play that a lot), honestly the gambit lines are fine but might not fit you, gambits require ability to really fight and counter-attack, for white italian is too passive for me, English puts you in a too closed position, ruy is just to passive, scholars is boring, fried liver is just way too common, grob is one of my favs, it's barely played just like bongcloud and but not a joke, it's good

Joseph_Truelsons_Fan
SamuelPlaysCheckers wrote:

This thingy. I looked it up it’s called a kings indian attack or a bongcloud. i need to learn because i need to win!!!

exCUSE ME?

bongcloud is e4 Ke2.

duntcare
Joseph_Truelsons_fan wrote:
SamuelPlaysCheckers wrote:

This thingy. I looked it up it’s called a kings indian attack or a bongcloud. i need to learn because i need to win!!!

exCUSE ME?

bongcloud is e4 Ke2.

hail the bongcloud master ROL

blueemu

If someone is attempting to win fast, then it's a poor opening not a good one. Chess isn't that easy.

blueemu
Der-Schachspieler wrote:
blueemu wrote:

If someone is attempting to win fast, then it's a poor opening not a good one. Chess isn't that easy.

IMHO this iis too harsh. There are opening traps in lots of (good) openings. For example QGA with e3 and the rook trap after b5, a6.......and Qf3.

But e3 is not White's best move in the QGA. It's not even the second-best.

I stand by my assertion: playing for a quick knock-out nearly always means playing inferior moves.

kJDG15
blueemu a écrit :
Der-Schachspieler wrote:
blueemu wrote:

If someone is attempting to win fast, then it's a poor opening not a good one. Chess isn't that easy.

IMHO this iis too harsh. There are opening traps in lots of (good) openings. For example QGA with e3 and the rook trap after b5, a6.......and Qf3.

But e3 is not White's best move in the QGA. It's not even the second-best.

I stand by my assertion: playing for a quick knock-out nearly always means playing inferior moves.

Sorry but that rule is not correct. One example amoung many others is the two knight défense: Whites go for a quick knock out with 3.Ng5 and it's not an inferior move or bad move for whites. 

blunderandhangpcs
The Jerome gambit is unbeatable
Lc0_1

Hillbilly gambit--works REALLY well  against unprepared opponents! ;P

Sneakiest_Of_Snakes

There are no easy "win fast with this opening" trick as someone stated before, why would anybody play anything else? However, to receive my title, I played a lot of tricky openings that could trick even 2200+ rated players. Here is my opening repertoire (don't tell any of my future opponents please).

White Openings:

1.e4

Against e5, Scotch Gambit (Seriously, this opening is underrated)

Against c5, Delayed Alapin (Super tricky opening)

Against e6, Wing Gambit (Somewhat dubious but I have a positive winrate with it)

Black Openings:

Against e4, Philidor Defence

Against d4, Budapest / Benko's Gambit (Not so common openings that can be very potent if used properly)

SamuelPlaysCheckers

can we play some games, sir???

Sneakiest_Of_Snakes

No need to call me Sir, lol. If you're 18, I'm only 2 years older than you. I have time for a game, if you would like.

SamuelPlaysCheckers

ok, thanks you!!

SamuelPlaysCheckers

can you challenge me, it says i cants challenge you sad.png challenge me to some 5 or 10 minute games.

AthenaTheChessCub
Sneakiest_Of_Snakes wrote:

There are no easy "win fast with this opening" trick as someone stated before, why would anybody play anything else? However, to receive my title, I played a lot of tricky openings that could trick even 2200+ rated players. Here is my opening repertoire (don't tell any of my future opponents please).

White Openings:

1.e4

Against e5, Scotch Gambit (Seriously, this opening is underrated)

Against c5, Delayed Alapin (Super tricky opening)

Against e6, Wing Gambit (Somewhat dubious but I have a positive winrate with it)

Black Openings:

Against e4, Philidor Defence

Against d4, Budapest / Benko's Gambit (Not so common openings that can be very potent if used properly)

Nice, I love the scotch and it usually catches opponents unprepared, altough it's a good opening, idk why don't you play it more... 

st0ckfish

please someone tell me that this is not true

https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/5141173764?tab=report

Sneakiest_Of_Snakes

Oooh, but I do @AthenaTheChessClub! It's amazing and I usually play it against people lower rated than me. Against people higher rated than me, I usually just play my boring old Colle Zukertort as it's a solid opening that is hard to crack! 

ninja888
kJDG12 wrote:
blueemu a écrit :
Der-Schachspieler wrote:
blueemu wrote:

If someone is attempting to win fast, then it's a poor opening not a good one. Chess isn't that easy.

IMHO this iis too harsh. There are opening traps in lots of (good) openings. For example QGA with e3 and the rook trap after b5, a6.......and Qf3.

But e3 is not White's best move in the QGA. It's not even the second-best.

I stand by my assertion: playing for a quick knock-out nearly always means playing inferior moves.

Sorry but that rule is not correct. One example amoung many others is the two knight défense: Whites go for a quick knock out with 3.Ng5 and it's not an inferior move or bad move for whites. 

ROL I play e3 in the QGA and i am 2100 national rating