MATRIX CHESS

Sort:
Windingshu

I will be happy to play you any time starting Thursday evening to Sunday night . But right now I am in the midst of an allnighter in order to get my project turned in on time tomorrow. Then I have a test to study for for Thursday... But once that storm has passed over, myself and/or Mr. Parham would be happy to play you and answer any questions you'd like.

That work?

Windingshu

Thats an interesting variation. I would say the bishop, knight, and pawn all have unique strengths. I would like to check out a game where Bd6 is played. Perhaps we could try it out.

Windingshu

Well I wasn't talking about right now. At some point perhaps.

Tricklev

Oh God, I can't believe I haven't put Rich on ignore, gotta put that on my to do list as soon as I come home.

 

Anyhow, 2. Qh5 is pretty much allways the best move, regardless of what black does. When the sun reflects of the moon and jupiters rings are clearly visible, it's time to arrange your attack vectors and aim them against saturnus. 2. Qh5!!!

Windingshu

Tricklev, now you are beginning to believe...

nuclearturkey

I think this thread may be becoming Windingshu's very own troll/idiot sanctuary. 

nuclearturkey

Thank God.

Windingshu

Well Rich, you really didn't contrbute anything to the discussion so I think that is for the best. You suggested an interested defense but you refused to demonstrate or explain it.

nuclearturkey
Windingshu wrote:

Well Rich, you really didn't contrbute anything to the discussion so I think that is for the best. You suggested an interested defense but you refused to demonstrate or explain it.


Bd6 is not interesting, just plain bad.

Windingshu
nuclearturkey wrote:
Windingshu wrote:

Well Rich, you really didn't contrbute anything to the discussion so I think that is for the best. You suggested an interested defense but you refused to demonstrate or explain it.


Bd6 is not interesting, just plain bad.


Why?

nuclearturkey

It's a terribly passive square for the Bishop, as well as completely disrupting Black's development. I'm surprised your vectors thing didn't help you see that. Wink 

Amanultra
(Sniffs) do I smell fish? I would love to play against you or the pink haired gorilla. I sent a turn based challenge because I have to work the rest of the week. 1.e4 e5 2. Bb5 is just ridiculous. Bd6 is the ugliest move I have seen this side of the millenia.
Amanultra
Another question If your moves are based on a formula to find the best move in a given position and you are using the same formulae how can there be a difference in rating or strengh from player to player?
Atos

I expect that the next match for world championship will be a tie between Parham and Windingshu, both using the Matrix vector formula. Needless to say, every game of the match will open with 1. e4 e5 2. Qh5. Unfortunately, the match will be closed for the public since it is taking place in mental hospital.

Amanultra
In the wing for the chessically insane. The wachowski memorial hospital.
Windingshu
Amanultra wrote:
Another question If your moves are based on a formula to find the best move in a given position and you are using the same formulae how can there be a difference in rating or strengh from player to player?

I would say because indexing is a method of gathering information. It is a way to see everything that is available to you. There is a learning process when it comes to anything. You have to learn how to recognize and understand the things that you see. And you have to learn how to take advantage of the situation. That is where the Matrix top 20 come into play. As a set of guidelines and  principles to help make the choice clear.

I'm being a good sport and answering your question to the best of my ability, I feel like it was kind of a rediculous question seeing as that the answer is fairly obvious. I mean, if there are sets of guidelines and books with openings, middle games, and endgames... How come every classical player isn't exactly the same as every other classical player? Yea, not a reasonable question.

drunkgoose

If you're that confident why not play rated mrhchess?

Amanultra
I think it is perfectly reasonable. The point of it was to present a sure way to find best moves based on formulas not principles right. Cause if you are saying you play on general principles then the system is just an ugly notation.
Amanultra
What you basically told me was that a positional understanding is needed. Guess what that is what chess players have been learning and teaching all along. Basically you are saying that there is no way to apply a formula to every position and you are simply analyzing ( indexing) and applying classical ideas. Basically doing the same thing but in a more complicated fashion.
Windingshu
[COMMENT DELETED]