mayhem in the morra

daxypoo
this book was recommended by my coach as not only a detailed resource on the smith morra - which i was curious about as an e4 player- but also as a very entertaining read

i am a beginner and have just started learning some ideas in the italian game as my e4 plan and ideas of how to continue if black doesnt go for it

i have started seeing more 1. e4 ...c5 in my games and i really didnt have a good plan and i often got into time trouble as my opponents were easily responding to my moved

i had stumbled on a line in the smith morra and i was intrigued at how easily white could develop if black takes the pawn- in fact the moves open up much like they do in my beloved italian game

i actually won a few friendlies against much higher rated players at my chess club and i even didnt play the moves correctly but the constant pressure was too much for some of these dudes

i personally like it as i (ironically?- since i am reading an opening book on an opening i dont want to study) dont want to start learning sicilian responses atm but the best thing about this book is the writing style

this is the first chess book i can “read”
the anecdotes and overall style make it very entertaining

anyways, what are your veteran opinions on the smith-morra?
ThrillerFan

There are many problems with what you are doing:

 

1) That book is WAY too complex and detailed for someone rated anything below 2000 over the board.

2) The Morra Gambit is borderline unsound.

3) You also have to know c3-Sicilian Theory, which is what the Morra transposes to 90% of the time when Black declines the gambit.  Again, you shouldn't even be studying specific openings, but rather, opening concepts.

 

The books you should be "reading" are ones like Play Winning Chess, Winning Chess Tactics, Winning Chess Strategies, and Winning Chess Endings by Yasser Sieriwan!

 

If you can't read those because you find it boring or too much work, then chess isn't for you.  Take up Tic Tac Toe.  It's an easier game to master!

DeirdreSkye

If you are a beginner and your coach recommended a book in Smith Morra then do yourself a favor:

Find another coach!

   He is as ignorant as you are(if not even more).

Don't be fooled by a good on line rating. A good on line rating doesn't mean he understands chess and certainly doesn't mean he knows how to teach.Not even a good OTB  rating is a guarantee that he can be a good teacher.

daxypoo
fwiw- book was not recommended as a "chessbook" per se- it was recommended more for entertainment value- the chess info was just bonus

the book my coach recommended for study was "chess tactics antennae" by neiman and this one has proven quite effective
pfren

The Morra is fine as an opening for beginners, but Esserman's book is not beginner stuff- by a very long shot.

I think it is a very good book, but there is one thing I don't like very much in it: His prose, which I've found as everything BUT entertaining, and slightly misleading.

Neiman's book is certainly a good one, I can recommend it too.

I would prefer & recommend  "Soviet Chess Primer" by Maizelis, which is a book about all phases of the game, and has a great (recent) English translation, but working on the antenna will certainly not harm you.

daxypoo
lol- thanks pfren i will look into "the soviet chess primer"
BobbyTalparov

@pfren already gave you some good info, and while I agree with the notion that you are wasting your time studying opening lines, but to demonstrate why:

 

 

pfren

Can you really label d4 as "IQP" here with a pawn on d7? let alone that this pawn is an extra one... tongue.png

AntonioEsfandiari

I have mayhem in the morra and I think it is an amazing book, perfect difficulty for me I think, and he is a great writer and uses vibrant language.  The biggest problem with the opening for a lower rated player is you usually have to either keep black in a tight positional bind even through to the endgame or create some explosive tactics before they unwind and coordinate, otherwise you are just down a pawn.  If you are even a little bit inaccurate as white your compensation quickly dissipates.  

AntonioEsfandiari

as far as e4 c5 d4 cxd c3 nf6 I think esserman recommends e5 not cxd

BobbyTalparov
pfren wrote:

Can you really label d4 as "IQP" here with a pawn on d7? let alone that this pawn is an extra one...

It is an isolated pawn on the queen file :-P

BobbyTalparov
AntonioEsfandiari wrote:

as far as e4 c5 d4 cxd c3 nf6 I think esserman recommends e5 not cxd

That is the correct move (which is in the variations as such).  The point was simply that 2 other "logical-looking" moves are mistakes for a reason (the e4 pawn is hanging), but if you do not have the understanding to see that, looking at the opening lines will do you no good (reinforcing the earlier points that he is wasting his time with the wrong book).

kindaspongey
daxypoo wrote:
... i will look into "the soviet chess primer"

"... The title might suggest [that The Soviet Chess Primer by Ilya Maizelis] is for beginners, but that is not the case. It does start off with some basic positions, but quickly moves on to much more advanced material including chapters on positional play and techniques of calculation." - IM John Donaldson

https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/2015/06/04/the-soviet-chess-primer/

http://www.qualitychess.co.uk/ebooks/Soviet_Chess_Primer-extract.pdf

kindaspongey

Possibly of interest:
Simple Attacking Plans by Fred Wilson (2012)https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090402/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review874.pdf
http://dev.jeremysilman.com/shop/pc/Simple-Attacking-Plans-77p3731.htm
Logical Chess: Move by Move by Irving Chernev (1957)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708104437/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/logichess.pdf
The Most Instructive Games of Chess Ever Played by Irving Chernev (1965)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/most-instructive-games-of-chess-ever-played/
Winning Chess by Irving Chernev and Fred Reinfeld (1948)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708093415/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review919.pdf
Back to Basics: Tactics by Dan Heisman (2007)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708233537/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review585.pdf
https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-back-to-basics-tactics
Discovering Chess Openings by GM John Emms (2006)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627114655/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen91.pdf
Openings for Amateurs by Pete Tamburro (2014)
http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2014/05/review-of-pete-tamburros-openings-for.html
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/openings-for-amateurs/
https://www.mongoosepress.com/catalog/excerpts/openings_amateurs.pdf
Chess Endgames for Kids by Karsten Müller (2015)
https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/tag/chess-endgames-for-kids/
http://www.gambitbooks.com/pdfs/Chess_Endgames_for_Kids.pdf
A Guide to Chess Improvement by Dan Heisman (2010)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708105628/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review781.pdf
Studying Chess Made Easy by Andrew Soltis (2009)
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708090448/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review750.pdf
Seirawan stuff:
http://seagaard.dk/review/eng/bo_beginner/ev_winning_chess.asp?KATID=BO&ID=BO-Beginner
http://www.nystar.com/tamarkin/review1.htm
https://web.archive.org/web/20140627132508/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/hansen173.pdf

https://www.chess.com/article/view/book-review-winning-chess-endings
https://web.archive.org/web/20140708092617/http://www.chesscafe.com/text/review560.pdf

kindaspongey
DeirdreSkye wrote: "If you are a beginner and your coach recommended a book in Smith Morra then do yourself a favor: Find another coach! ..."
daxypoo wrote:
fwiw- book was not recommended as a "chessbook" per se- it was recommended more for entertainment value- the chess info was just bonus ...

An alternative is presented in My First Chess Opening Repertoire for White

https://www.newinchess.com/media/wysiwyg/product_pdf/9033.pdf

https://chessbookreviews.wordpress.com/2018/04/01/opening-lines/

daxypoo
thanks kindaspongey; i have both of moret’s books on chessable though i put the one for black on the back burner; however, i love the opening for white-
MickeyDeadGuys

Mayhem is a great book, and it’s a kick ass gambit.  Keep the coach.

SeniorPatzer

Never heard of the book.  Went to Amazon and the reviews were very complimentary.  

kindaspongey

https://www.qualitychess.co.uk/ebooks/MayhemintheMorraExcerpt.pdf

"... Though the analysis often runs deep, the presentation is very straight-forward. ..."

http://kenilworthian.blogspot.com/2012/08/review-of-mayhem-in-morra-and-smith.html

http://www.kenilworthchessclub.org/games/java/2012/mayhem-notes.htm

mickynj

If you play the Morra, you will have fun and get the chance to practice your attacking and combinations. Esserman's book seems pretty advanced, but you can learn quite a lot about attacking  just going over his example games, without memorizing all the theory. People will tell you that the Morra is dubious, or "borderline unsound," and they may be right. If you have white against Karjakin or Wesley So or Magnus Carlsen, I would hesitate to use the Morra. If your are playing your peers, start hacking!