Any knowlegeable chess player, whether they were white or black, would probably never use this opening. For one, it is just plain pathetic, and two, no two chess players with even a little bit of sense about them, are never going to play the exact same way(or somewhat). Yeah, it is possible, but I duobt it would ever happen.
My new opening
Sort:
Suppose the original poster is not 12, suppose he or she is a 40 year old beginner, that's no reason to trash them with name-calling. Point out the weakness in the opening sure, but you shouldn't call them an idiot. We should encourage and teach beginners in the game we love.
Jun 6, 2009
0
#44
eddiewsox wrote:
Suppose the original poster is not 12, suppose he or she is a 40 year old beginner, that's no reason to trash them with name-calling. Point out the weakness in the opening sure, but you shouldn't call them an idiot. We should encourage and teach beginners in the game we love.
i agree. 100%
ilikeflags wrote:
eddiewsox wrote:
Suppose the original poster is not 12, suppose he or she is a 40 year old beginner, that's no reason to trash them with name-calling. Point out the weakness in the opening sure, but you shouldn't call them an idiot. We should encourage and teach beginners in the game we love.
i agree. 100%
okaaay.... I cannot believe I am the only one who saw this as a humourous thread? I mean, the kid was funny. It was great... took a fine eye to maneuver all the pieces in such a way as to an entirely symmetrical, aesthetic configuration. No, of course he doesn't deserve the stupid hateful comments above, but why are some of you getting morose and over serious. It was a lark, it was fun, it was funny. Have a smile.
Bajoran_Moon wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
eddiewsox wrote:
Suppose the original poster is not 12, suppose he or she is a 40 year old beginner, that's no reason to trash them with name-calling. Point out the weakness in the opening sure, but you shouldn't call them an idiot. We should encourage and teach beginners in the game we love.
i agree. 100%
okaaay.... I cannot believe I am the only one who saw this as a humourous thread? I mean, the kid was funny. It was great... took a fine eye to maneuver all the pieces in such a way as to an entirely symmetrical, aesthetic configuration. No, of course he doesn't deserve the stupid hateful comments above, but why are some of you getting morose and over serious. It was a lark, it was fun, it was funny. Have a smile.
:(
SerbianChessStar wrote:
Bajoran_Moon wrote:
ilikeflags wrote:
eddiewsox wrote:
Suppose the original poster is not 12, suppose he or she is a 40 year old beginner, that's no reason to trash them with name-calling. Point out the weakness in the opening sure, but you shouldn't call them an idiot. We should encourage and teach beginners in the game we love.
i agree. 100%
okaaay.... I cannot believe I am the only one who saw this as a humourous thread? I mean, the kid was funny. It was great... took a fine eye to maneuver all the pieces in such a way as to an entirely symmetrical, aesthetic configuration. No, of course he doesn't deserve the stupid hateful comments above, but why are some of you getting morose and over serious. It was a lark, it was fun, it was funny. Have a smile.
:(
See, now... you are funny! 
I am not 12 nor 40, I am a 9 year old boy
That is my real opening. I was not trying to be funny.
And by the way, SerbianChessStar, that is a not so good opening. You should try my opening instead, SerbianChessStar.
Sharpieman2 wrote:
I am not 12 nor 40, I am a 9 year old boy
Yes, but I just find it a bit odd that you would put down 1996 as your date of birth on your profile.
3 possibilities in this thread
1.) Poster is pulling our legs REALLY well.
2.) Poster is indeed a young 9 year old lad who knows nothing about chess (nor his date of birth) yet but is endearingly cute in his attempts to progress in the game.
3.) Poster is... yea, no polite way to say this. RR is getting flak for it already I see.
Yea, so come out clean Sharpieman2... we're all more than just a little curious. By the way, like the other posteres have said, that is NOT a good opening. If you want to learn why we ALL say this, we will be more than happy to TEACH you why. However this is a two way street: don't keep saying its a good opening because you think it is. ASK us to understand why.
It's called a troll. You lot all got owned. Good job, Sharpieman.
LarsT wrote:
It's called a troll. You lot all got owned. Good job, Sharpieman.
I guess we did. Thanks for leading me to waste my time when I could have been trying to help someone who actually wants it..
new idea............
Jun 7, 2009
0
#56
Sharpieman2 wrote:
I invented this opening [ This is both white and black using my opening] :
Hmm, If you want to revolutionalize chess, use the last position as start up position in a normal chess game :)
Sharpieman2 wrote:
I invented this opening [ This is both white and black using my opening] :
there are lots of drawbacks in this opening like effective ness of the castling without the three pawns
LarsT wrote:
It's called a troll. You lot all got owned. Good job, Sharpieman.
Yep. Indeed we have.
madstermind wrote:
3 possibilities in this thread
1.) Poster is pulling our legs REALLY well.
2.) Poster is indeed a young 9 year old lad who knows nothing about chess (nor his date of birth) yet but is endearingly cute in his attempts to progress in the game.
3.) Poster is... yea, no polite way to say this. RR is getting flak for it already I see.
Yea, so come out clean Sharpieman2... we're all more than just a little curious. By the way, like the other posteres have said, that is NOT a good opening. If you want to learn why we ALL say this, we will be more than happy to TEACH you why. However this is a two way street: don't keep saying its a good opening because you think it is. ASK us to understand why.
But before I go I will say that what RR said was still (again) grossly out of order. The original poster turning out to be a well.. you know ttro.. no I can't say it , many comments later doesn't make what RR said any more decent. Especially considering that a kid (?) just arsing around on one forum is nothing compared to RR's repeated idiocy on the forums..
kinda stupido