I have heard the opposite advice when dealing with super fast games. maybe only a skimthrough after IMO. too many missed moves (which is natural with the time, you played a great game)
4...d5 looks nice, the transpo looks a little rough. not sure.
I have heard the opposite advice when dealing with super fast games. maybe only a skimthrough after IMO. too many missed moves (which is natural with the time, you played a great game)
4...d5 looks nice, the transpo looks a little rough. not sure.
I think White could improve on the play from that position. Nf3, for example. Of course, cxd4 is probably objectively the best move, but that would be well outside the Smith-Morra.
في بعض الأحيان لعب هذا الانفتاح، وتتمتع تعليمي قصيرة. شكرا!
I don't fully get what You are typing here, may you explain it.
I think White could improve on the play from that position. Nf3, for example. Of course, cxd4 is probably objectively the best move, but that would be well outside the Smith-Morra.
I would be delightet to have some more moves to analyize, but I am not sure in what line and what move number you want white to play Nf3
Ah yes Nf3 is is much better, I have made another thread explaning more of why Nf3 was a good start.
http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/my-smith-morra-gambit-02
If you need help, please contact our Help and Support team.
Hi guys,
Nice of you to check my first submission.
I have read in some old article that blitz could be useful for analyzing, and memorizing openings. I am doing some bullet 1:1 games which I know it is like a drunk chess, however it is very useful to analyize them.. and every time I play a morra smith gambit game, I learn something new, here you are what I have learn lately.