New Analysis on Openings

Inspired by Ivoryknight42 I have made a forum

Please volunteer openings that you feel should be analysed

I start with the tarrasch defense Marshall Gambit
d4 d5 c4 e6 Nc3 c5 cxd5  exd5 e4!? dxe4 d5

Rybka so far gives an evaluation of -0.17 depth 13 after the following sequence :Nf6 Nxe4 Qe7 f3 Bf5 Bd3 Nxd5 Qe2 Qe5 f4 Qe6 Nxc5 Bxd3 

How does the position sound?

I think white has a good position

Can anyone who knows the theory please comment on whether this complies with theory

The opening tree on chessok says f5 instead of Nxe4 as first choice, but Rybka gives equality after f5, after Nh3 Nf6 Bf4 a6 d6 Nc6 Nd5 Nxd5 Qxd5 Qa5+ Bd2 

The opening tree also gives Bg5 for white instead of Nxe4 which Rybka gives       -0.23 after Be7 Bxf6 Bxf6 Qa4+ Kf8 Qxe4 Qa5 Ne2 g6 Qa4 Qxa4 Nxa4 Nd7

OK, we know Rybka can play chess. Can you?

Why are you making such comments? My aim with this forum is to analyse openings that have been debated upon by the chess community, not to prove my own chess ability. 

Let's not bicker here and continue on our quest to find the answer to questions everyone is asking

Can you volunteer an opening?

What qualifies you (or me, or the majority of chess.com users) to make an accurate analysis of Rybka's output? What do you expect to gain from doing so? Are you expecting your next OTB opponent to follow you 12 moves deep into home preperation on Tarrasch Marshall Gambit?

It's a much better excercise for all involved if you put away the computer and use your noggin'

I am making an analysis? What a joke!~ 

I am merely conveying Rybka's analysis and discussing the position

And any chess player has the right to discuss a position

I am not preparing, I am just analysing

For preparation, of course I do not expect that and I only affirm myself with the ideas of the position and the first 10 theory moves

I'd love to see some comparissons on different lines in the French - Tarrasch Variation:

1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Bd3 c5 6.c3 Nc6

with 7: Ne2 (mainline), Ngf3 (Korchnoi Gambit), Ndf3 (unknown)

I'd also be curious how the French - Reti Gambit looks:

1.e4 e6 2.b3 d5 3.Bb2

Thanks Mezemr, am happy to answer

Although by no means do I agree with Arctor, I suggest everyone pools their suggestions first and we try them out on Rybka

Here are some games

And two more

Since we are on the Ruy, here's two more variations for us to discuss